High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Shivashakthi Recreation … vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Shivashakthi Recreation … vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 November, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

omen THIS THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009
BEFORE ' C

THE HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE AJIT J.GUNi;{AL-«iii-L~li f  _

WRIT PETITION No.34295 OF' [2io0%9{GM4'i>ioi;:C'e1j _ Q C'  

BE)! WEEN:

Sari Shivashakthi Recreation Association, .
E.Rama,mu1"thy Complex,   '
Kanakapura Main Road,

Konanakunte Cross, 
Opp. Manasa Theater,
Banga1ore--560 062, A V 
Represented by its vSeC:-_"eta'1*y;
Sri Kumar. "   =i '"

 '  .PETi'E'iONER

(SriVisi:nu  ' ~C

AND:

 1.  State of'E'§.§1iIiateLka,

. R£~:f)'r&js.er:t.ed by ItS"Secretary,
"Depa3:t:«:rier1t,of Home,

 __ :VV.iG.}3  'vS'ei1t_iha,

~. Ba'r1ga1o1¢e--'1, ."

--V 2.  Goriifiiissione-r of Police,

Iri'f3§i;i;_fy Road, Bangalore City,

  '' Banga1ore~560 O01.

--  he Deputy Commissioner of Police,

__  South Division, Bangalore.



Ix.)

4. The Asst. Corrirnissicmer of Police,
Banashankari Sub-D1'Vision,
Bangalore.

5. The Inspector of Police,
Kurnaraswamy Layout Police Station,
Mysore Road, Bangalore.

6. The City Crime Branch of Policc;"" *
Rayan Circle, Mysore Road, V

Bangalore. V    * .  ~

(Sri N.B.Vishwanath, AGA)

This writ petitionis filed' 'u.r1de'1*.._Article's 226 and
227 of the Constitution [of I-_nd.j_ia  to direct the
respondents not to insist the iyetitio-nerfiio 'obtain licence
under Karnataka Police"'»Act '*o_ry_u.nder'Tlicencing and
Controlling oi",Pl'ace.s o17_Pu_b--l.ic Arririfsernent for playing of
skill games_lik.e cjl*ie_ss,j'sniooi(er,fy' carom, electronic coin

garr1es@_da1ft«s Vga:nne,"rrnnn*:-y 'etc. in the premises of the
petitioner--association. '  

This dwrit .p'etit'ior1'~°ucoIning on for preliminary

_v hearing' this day..,__the Court made the following:

ORDER

‘yiisl;ixvanat.h, learned AGA is directed to

_ take””not.ice””tor respondents. Learned counsel for the

” pe”titi.oner to serve a set of papers on him.
/

/X

3

2. Even though the {flatter is listed for preliminary
hearing. with the coiisent of both the counsel, it i.s
taken up for final disposal. H

3. The petitioner is an
under the Karnataka Societies ” it
The Case of the petitioner–Assoeiaftioii
engaged in conducting
snooker, billiards ete..;__fo1′ oi;.it’s.iiieii€l:).ers. It
is the ease of the peti”ti:on.ei:’i._ti§ii:2}tt’4llfiieltrespondents are
insisting that petitiionlegilighjotildll under

the Katnatalilav-“.Poliee’zAet__ or.’ under the provisions of

Lieensing3’_a;nvd of Places of Public

XXEI1U.§’e3€i’1’i’€1’l{, Oxrd_er. V

4.:l.’k:’d€fi?fitlC8l questions have been considered by

W.P.No.l8625/2005 disposed of on

V. holding that permission under the

it “‘V.V,;p1*o2:isions of Licensing and Controlling of Places of

Public Amusement: Order is not required to run a

fie