High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Shyam Prasad Shetty Y vs Asst Executive Engineer on 1 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Shyam Prasad Shetty Y vs Asst Executive Engineer on 1 June, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
IN THE HIGH comm' 0? KARNATAKA, BANGP§£.§}'nR j§;.,A<
DATED THIS THE 3.81' DAY, 0:? JUNE;      -
BEF'OIi.'E~~ é _    '
THE HONBLE MR. 
WRIT PETITION N§ 2_ss'--'*- 
4TH STAGE, "IND':§_}S'I'R_ViAL.TO'§?'il§f 

RAJAq1§1Ac§A'R _  _  .v
BAN€}AL£_3RE"~'36{}'€}%$é?r"'-  " _ 

 PETIT'iONER.

(By  % )
AND V' % V V "

1, ~  ASST EXECE.?I'_I\IE ENGINEER
 BESCQM, 0 5:. M UNITJ9
~ _V V 1\;3,~. SUB. [_}IVISi()N
 TRA;..IM1rs_A;3AR
-  BANGALORE
. . "  '  RESPONDENT.

(By GUWa,ADv. )

H ‘THIS WP. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE

“«:i<')'N's'r1TUTIoN, PRAYING T0 QUASH ANNEX – C 1.3., REPORT

ISUEB BY THE RESPQNDENT DTD 17.4.09 AND ANNE.X«{) VERDE

"*i:3ILL DTD 19.5.09 ISSUED BY THE} RESFQNDENT.

THIS PE'I'i'I'iON COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
TPHS BAY, THE COURT' MADE THE FOLLOWING:

he is making um of a part of the msidential pmmisééffor non-

residential purpose. Indeed, it is also noticed that–f1;é__'_fjé':iifioner

is required. to file a mply to they saié demaxgd 1}3_ef-bit;

Local omcer who is requireti to co:;:sid9;r':}m:_Tsa'AH;§'; –

has not been dorm.

6. Consequently, tht: petii:ig)12..$§taa11ii–sLA disfebsecl dinectjng the:
peiifioner to file his obj¢{:ti£)n$’.tf)q?«;th;e” j;:i.:é:i..’~:rI_1:1a1::1(i notice Within a

period of four wefflarg. It the petitioner shaii

be given” regard. ‘Till the objections

am coxisidefcti; Shail not pxecipitatc the matter.

..«§9l5’etit1’on fiisposed of accomiingly.

A learned counsel is permitted to file power

Sd/’-9
Iudgé

vge