High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Siddappa S/O Bhimappa … vs Chandrakant S/O Vasudev Megharaj on 28 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Siddappa S/O Bhimappa … vs Chandrakant S/O Vasudev Megharaj on 28 August, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda
 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA§§A;.' " 

CERCUFF BENCH AT GU1;BA}'§'(';§;)§£~~.Vv A ff 
PREsENTV '    

DATED THIS THE 28??'  DAY'4'Q.}:i"AUG£,i&3'1" i2O0é§:  

THE HONBLE MR.  Efi.S1§P3E i");'.{§{;3.i"§3EI2;31C)
THE HONBLE MR. JUs?rIC:E B.sR§:is;§i{vAsE GOWDA

 "'MfTf?A §\_IO;3?;'3:28',/&§vC$53€>.._.(1:V\:*IV')

BE'I'W_EE2N:  

Sri. Sidéappa  _ . » _ 
S / Q' Bhinlappa Padasaléagi,
Ages; 40 ~ymrs," €130: Coolie

 .,  _ Of vBmmgm_zGafli, .. ..... ..
» }is'ijap1,1:'«s €386 __1O 1. ...Appe:3.1a:m;

% ';§§ksri%153:;1ax;g¢i;aa Siddappa, Aciv.,)

'  AND; 

V' V' » n1. 'C;hai1drakant, S/{Z}. Vasudev Meghaxaj,

V' *»--Age: Majtror, Occ: Confiactar,
R/0 Sai Mandi}; Sai Nagar,
Mudhoi.

2. The Branch Manager,
United India illsurance Co. Ltd,
SS. Front Read,

crest" 4 ._..

l"\::...«._.. (\*1 T'a,...... .....'l., ¢.._
;::13ayu1'- coo .112 1. ...z<:t:§pu1Lut:i1L§

3/



{By Sri RV. Naclagouda, Adm, fer R 3, Sri Shivananda
Patti, 15L£'1V., for R2) 

This Miscellaneous First: Appeal is filed  1)

of MV Act against tha Judgnént anti .i'ja3.é:-:~.*:_T€i%. 
30.06.2005

passed in MVC Ne.3g3;o4 an v’f-kgfléfilg «Qi’t}”1c..

Member, MA{3’i’–iV, Ctiurt cf m¢,~ sign i§:’1i_T;I’i1A(1g¢,.V;’,:33jj’$1V?3jLi§f;’,

partly allowing the reference

compensafien and (if L’

compensatien.

This MFA 0I’dE:I’S this day,

K.SE§EE§H;fi’R the fo11owing:–


 ficnenmnr

A    ailawed. Delay COI1dOI1(3d.

. '  takes notice fer R-1.

z Sim petitionar sustained “fracture: Gf right scaplfla,

clavicle and fiactmt of 2nd, 3″‘, 431 and 5&1 ribs on

th-:2 right side”. Basics fracture of Cllaviczle there is mal-

union <31' ether framures. Petitioner is aged about 38

years at the time 01" accident. The total body disability

assessed by the Tribtmal is 20%, which is an the higher

sida, it is to be assesscd at 15%. Petitioner is zicoolie,

his income is to be assessed at Thc

income: 1035 Praportionate to the

pm. The loss ef future mcomcffi

vmuxd be 315 (income) mg {menfhl x M ;mu;tAagm~;% $

——-52,920/-.

G33 ‘§;r3ia*ij,pn ‘of “this. aividence, the petitioner $.93

eI1′{:i1;:1’r;:d’ for bf Rs.40,(}00/- for pain and

agony, 3053 of arnenities, Rs.10,000/–

‘~ _ vimtsidtzntal expenses and Rs. 10,000/–a for

‘ during laid up period and R5.52,9:’2O/-

fpf 10$s’t;§_fi1f.ure incomes an account uf dfmability. In ail

the ” _ géetjfioncr is entitled fer cornpensaticn of

«.RM%$’;’:,22,92o/m as against R$.1,15,00{}/— awarded by the

Tribunai. On the enhanced compenmuon the claimant

is entititid far interest at 69/o pa. from the date of

pfitition till payment.

Ii.

m/

Lr

Appca} allowed accordingly.