IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 1 1'?" DAY OF NOVEMBER
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N. AN,«.N;;A '-if: '
CRIMINAL PETITION :No.4:8?%i«Mu20.:i.Q'----. " d i-- T 3
BETWEEN: ._ *
Sri.Sri.Ba1ayogi Madhumayana11dér.Swan1iji._ ' .
Peetadhipathi "
Sarvajna Sadhararna Peeta
Munirabad V '
Koppa1Taluk and District _ V A i
Branch Mutt : Vanakailu Malleshwara E{she'tra
Sompura Hobli V. ' "
Ne1amanga1aTa'n;k-~_ V
Bangalore Rura1E?i~striet;--A ' ~ ...Petitioner
{By Sr. s.My1araiah Associates,
Advoc_ates_}_
The State of Kamattaka' _
By DabaspetiPoIi'ee Station '
Ne1amangaiaTa1uk_ _ , V
Bangalore Rural Di'stric'*:. Respondent
' ' - o {By"Sr:;<.r1;a;zakum§:£":\/Iggage, HCGP)
-- ufpeetiitgon is filed under section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to
._ei.11af-trgVe«the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Cr.
No 147 / 201 Oiiof Dabaspet Poiice Station, Nelamangala Taluk,
Bénga.i_'ore.{R) District, registered for an offence punishable under
section'{f$06 IPC.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made
"thesfollowing:
Ix)
ORDER
The petitioner is arrayed as accused
No.14″? /2010, registered for an offence
section 306 IPC.
2. 1 have heard Sri A.B.Pati1,:=.a1earne.d senior”-coiifnselifor
petitioner and Sri Vijaykumar Majage,
State. I have been taken througiijnivestigatipon frecords.
3. As per first invfofiiiation one Siddaraiu, the
petitioner, who is :.,poI:”«.,”/é$ifi–a71:al1u Malleshwara
Kshetra, Sofnpu1fi*a’_VIioio1i,€_Ne1arnangaia”‘i’a1uk. was indulging
in soarne iactivities and the was bringing ladies to the
Math. Tifie’deceasedfdiddhajgiogananda Swarny was the junior
swamy of Mutt was disgusted with the behaviour
p0;.{he-e:pei::ion¢f;”e”‘s'(5’ also the public. The petitioner had
deceased that he was anointed by him and had
‘th:reatenedE–.V.ihe deceased dire consequences to his life. On
accouvnf; of conduct of petitioner, the deceased committed
‘suicide in Vanakallu Malleshwara Kshetra.
4. As against this version of investigation, the petitioner
has come up with another version that the personsfw’ho are
interested in grabbing properties of said mutt
the deceased and Eodged first infonnation’~..V.ag:ain’st tithe’
petitioner to mis~direct themMinVestigation.§’–_x the
circumstances, petitioner is apprehending aifresit “in’=.4C1*ime.g
No.14?/2010 for an offencei”pbi11i.shabie._nnri;3rxs;eetion 30’EV3V
IPC. _ _
5. Though in the he stated that the
deceased wasbeing harassment by the
petitioner; .. _:of__ harassment are stated.
Therfiis ‘no proximity of incident and the so
cailed mental The contents of post–mortem
examination wouid reveal Eigature mark around the neck of
» per inquest report, Eigature used was a black
and dead body was found hanging from
the bariofiiiventilator of the roof. The matter is still under
V ‘*i:1vf_estigation. At this stage of the case, there is no prima
facie materiai to show that petitioner was
~97»
Vanakallu Malleshwara Kshetra either on the date of
incident or on the previous date of incident. ffher’efore,
without going into further details, direction is
granted for a limited period to enable to seeker»
bail before jurisdictional Court.
6. The criminal petition accepted. it .
I.
If the petitioner is__ai1rested bv’£)«ab_aspfet Police in
connection.iifovigtlfi,L 47/2010, for an
offence punishabietg 306 IPC, he
H released on jbvaillonllexecuting a bond for
at {Rupees Fifty Thousand
a surety for the like sum.
be petitioner for the purposes of investigation
_5ha11fV”Wappear before Investigation Officer
wlfiienever called upon to do so.
The petitioner shali not intimidate or tamper
with prosecution Witnesses.
,’\j .
This order would be operative for a periorlof two
months from today, within such timel,”
shall seek regular bail
Court. In such an cit/en’t;’ tl_v1<?::_le-':.11*i7l_éd_xtliifige of ii
the jurisdictional Cot;tr:t'._
application with.o:i1t being by
observati o"n.$ madél initlails" – order. V"
before ' -. j .1.115i_SdiCtior1la_&l ' 'w