High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Sridhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 July, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri Sridhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 July, 2010
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
.!Q _.

-1...

IN 'I'}"H£ HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN

IDATEID '1')?-wIIS'I'I~iE 23"! DAY OF JULY. 291  A'

BEFO RE

THE HONBLIE MRJUSTIC13iS;'ABDU_L NVAz'9«:';:r§  

wrm' P£€Ti'I'£ON N0.1.Ei926 65:? 25:0 (C: s--~_1 %_éL/M) " 

BETWEFZN:

SR1 SRIDHAR
S/OSIDDEGOWDA V 

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS  

GENDEHOSAHALLI __

SRIRANGAPA'I'E\EA'VI'ALUK V ._  q 

MANDYA DIs'rR1(:'_1'" 5  _  ...P}33'I'I'HONE3R

[By 51.-1..x2--;.$Ri;§IvAs';_'.r§b\(.;  "

AND

1.

‘rH;I;: S’I’A’i’E._ oi?” KAR.NA=’.1TA{{_A
BY ITS G%Qvt3RNMEN’r>;._,» ” ‘
. 13£;I’)A.I-er1’M13:\3′;’ ()F;C,O {JP
M s £3L}Ei.I)IN’C3 .7’BAI”»I(3A.L(‘) RE
,, ._2 BANGA.I.ORf3-..CI’IY _

. 3 ‘rm; ADM-INIS’l’RA’I’OR
= GENDE¥’*{C)SAH.AE.I,I MILK CO OPEZRATIVE SOCIETY
GENI3;;;1«i£js;A;HA1_.1.i
. “SR1I2A:\éGAm’::’NA ‘m1.uI<
__ MA_N'1'}YA' DISTRI CT

AA : :«:1,1=:C'1':oN OFFICER
_ "GENDE}-i()SAI"{AI.I-I MILK co ()PERA'J'IVE SOCIIRZTY
* 'GE?.NDi€E'-EOSAI"-"EAILI
SRIRANGAPATNA 'J'AI..UK
MANDYA 1:)1s'm1c:'1'

……2_.

-1. ASSIS’I”AI\?’I’ I2I*3C}IS’I’RAI{ OF CO OP S()CIE’I’IES
PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION

PANDAVAPURA I{E1SI{(_)I’E.I§E1I\If!S< V.

[By SMT. M.C.I\-IAGASHREIE. IICGP)

THIS wnn" PI'<3"I'I'I'ION IS FILED '»:_;N::u«:r~:25'Arizi:i1<::~: 29z:§*yr«x.i'§?:)i
227 OF '1'1~e11; CONS"I"I'I'U'l"ION OF INI)IA.'.Ij_'RAYING "lie AQUASI-i; ALL
E~'UR'I'IwIEZR PRC)(3BI'§I)INGS PI_»J"R-S[.}AN'I"A.V TO c;A1.:a;;'x:.1)g-IR or' –. '

EVEI\I'I'S DTD 07.05. 10 VI DE ANN'I§X¥~C TO 'II'II:§"\'.{

THIS WRIT PI'£'I'I"I'ION CC)eI\!£–II:\AI"G_ ON FOI§"f?.RE;ILIMINARY

HEARING B' GROUP fims D_!\Y._'1'}-I.I:3.CQUR'I' PASSED THE
FOLLOWING: . –. ..

I have Vt’Ii–e,Ieé.}’fJIedCetgnsel for the parties.

2}–._ In –t:}1iIsfcaé’ee_ ‘”L~he’*..p’et;it:ioners have sought for

quashing 0f_t4l1e eTa._le7n_(I’zz.r”_.c)I’ events {Annexure~C} issued

by respIc’)mIev_r’1’_’:_f'<)1' holding of the elections to the

."~._rr§an.aVgiI1g'«.C:QIfiz'11it't.ee 01' the Gendehosahalli Milk C0-

op~e19a-ti'veI' ."F:'30t::ie1;y, S1'i1*a11e1g21pat1121 Taluk. Memdya

«VDist1'i"i:t': 'per the calendar of events, the elections to

"me s'o..r;&1'etI3I/ was scheduled to be held on 7.5.2010. Thie

=~C<)$;:1rt has not gr:g1I'1t,ed int:e1'im stay of the elections. –

'I

..3…

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits.-t_hat

the election to the managlrlg committee of the.”:aE5’o3:?ev_e

society has aiready been held in a(:ctorda111c:.e”‘Vvit,1f1″‘f}1eV_v_’e ‘

Calendar of evemis. There is no (T}1::?1I1er’1g.e to the ‘e1eet.ioi<1si"–~

in this writ: petition. Therefore, this:'–_pzet,iti() §i 'does'

survive for Consideration at thi.s'V"stage. '-It is facéorfldingiy
dismissed. However. libelfty ies'"%e'3.e'2"v"ed' to the"p"et.1tioner
to challenge the elections. 'ini'v'aeeor(faiieé'with law. No

Costs'

____ N

KLY /