High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Stanilaus Pinto vs The National Insurance Co Ltd on 4 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Stanilaus Pinto vs The National Insurance Co Ltd on 4 June, 2009
Author: V.Jagannathan
IN THE: HEGH CZQLFETT C1}? §{ARNAT;%§{A ET BANC%ALC}RE
Sateé the 431 day {bf JLEIEEE 2009
: B E 1??' Q R E : V 
TEE H€Z3N'BLE MRJUSTICEE : V.Jg%GANNA1j'EE§~_;E\§"". 

MISGELLANEGUS FIRST APPEAL No’ 9434%%.£%’#%2’c:§§%’z_;@§§:?::3,

BETWEEN ;

Sr}. Staniiaus Pinto,
Agfid 48 years,

E/a QNO. if)/1?,
fignca Village,
Shakthinagara Past,
Mangalere. V

. . .App€:Bam:

(@ E§;K§rj’;§n3;kéi:fj,~._A:dv;3%ifate. )

The 1\§a1i{)i:a1 }’::*.5V1;e-xii-:c=”‘1_(5«:%__ Ltd,
Brmich Ofiice, I §<_'i(:o_i',=…
E1T1§«?ri~3'$ COIYIFQBVXQ '
. ¢_ B{:iii11&f£;i:a,_ D K
gepresenzgq by its Branch Manager.

‘ V. ” ” — …R€:-spondent

.’ . By Sri S.Srisha;i1a., Advattatc. )

§¥’;1′;scel3anee:us First Appaal filed Lmder $@cti<::n

" '~ _V1'?:? {é1) of the M.'if.Act against the jucigxmmt anal award

M-éiated 219.2005 passed in MVC: Ne. 1389/2394 on the

file Sf the E Add}. Civil Judge {SR;}31'é') 813d CJM and

MA<.1'F–"~.?, M'anga10r{; .E).K., part}? allewing the 613121:

Em)

peI:ifio11 fer croilxpensaticm mad seekiflg e1111an<:&:11{=:m: of
c<:)111peI1sai:i01'2.

This appeal cczming am far haaring tfi1};$_r12é.;?;’VT.{}3;cf
caurt delivered the f011owi:1g : A

JUDGMENT,{

The appfiilarzt is aggri_¢_=:§red”‘ L.

compensation awafiitsd ta by and

hence this appea}.

2. The argued that

the iI1j%_1I°i_€§’A”‘3x a.pjpe11a:1i: in a meter accident
lad ta Vte£::¥i1V axtzd the appaiiazzzt was

advised to vt&L¥r:$ a:id._ I’@fEiI’i’iI}.g ms the alnount givsu by the

“”;}§;:i.:€;T§*”‘bfher heads, €I}ha1″1C€I1″15I1§Z is sought.

Taiiirxg into acc0Lmt the Iiafilffi sf £316: injuries

“ii by the appeiiarz: anti $31516 pair: while chetazirzg

fiied, I am Qf ‘aha: View that tawards loss of axxzanitias of

fife, E-%s.,15,0{}C?/-« wifl haw 1:0 be awarded and izmxgardg

ftjture trcatznezni, Rs. 1{3,QQ<'Z!f»-« would be raasgnabie.

fi/

4. ‘1’h::: c0Inpe1’1satio:1 gets €I’}h&I}.{iZ(“‘;(1 by Rs.2.5’,’§{}Q/ –

out of which Rs.1.§,{3i)G/- W11} Ca:’ry irzterfizst

the appeal in part.

Ck:::/ –

33. The award stands nlociifieti’ é;Cc0t’:ii;1giy b§,%_:3i1€;:é§:ifig b