1 WP} 14 17.07
m 111:: max comer or KARIATAKA AT mumnnoaz
nxrnn mm 'rm: 271'! mm or JUIE. zoos
microns: j 'E .
ms Humans nan. JUSTICE n.v. SHYLEHDQEL
Writ Petition No. 1 141 7 of200'? " 'A f '
Between:
SR1. SUDARSHAN
s/0 LATE CHELUVAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
NO. 16, arm MAIN ROAD,
sun CROSS, MUNIKARIAPPA
COMPOUND,
AGRAHARA DASARA!-IALLI; --
BANGALORE-~560079. ; PETITIONER
[By Sri. K:1_1ma:' " rV.', PxL'(jv;"]
1. DEPIJTY RE:31s'_I'*EAR«vEQ'E..__ -- .
COAQPERATIVE' 'E.o'c1_
MALLESWARAM'; CIRCLE, MALLESWARAM,
E "8Ai%§3fi};ORE..C!TY,
3Ai¢GA.Lc>.i2E -- 560 003.
_ 3. "-44..BAEUJ.tL'§Eous1Ne CO--OPERA'I'IVE
SQC!.E'I'Y, BAPUJI NAGARA,
A MYSSRE ROAD,
A 'BANGALORE - 560 026,
V' » EEP. BY rrs SECRETARY.
BAPUJI HOUSING CO--OPERATIVE
SOCIETY, BAPUJI NAGARA,
MYSORE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 026,
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT.
2 WP1 1417.07
5. sm. VISWANATHA
s/0 M.V. NAGARMU,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
NO. 73, Sm MAIN ROAD,
cuss: STAGE,
VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 040.
6. SR1. B. MUNIMARE GOWDA
s/0 BOLE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 5? YEARS,
NO. 106,! STAGE,
SARASWATHINAGAR, T
VIJAYANAGAR, _ '_ '
BANGALORE - 560 940, _ "1¥ESPONDENTS
[By Smt. Asha M. Ku1fibargé:i1i1a;th,"HCGPVibr R1 65 R2;
Sri. A. Nagarajsppa, Sri.;M.--'S. Riidraiah,
Sri; -.J.M. Adjvs. F01: F56;
Sri. Mahésh =:Shctty,AAd'v...f<23: R3 6:. R4;
_. «Vi-iri, Adv. for R5]
THIS WRIT5.PETf"iFI'ON"IS'FILED"UNDER ARTZCLES 225 85 227
OF' 'f'§~IE'-._CQ2'£-. "§'I,!'1_'}GN 'O_Fn._{_NDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER rxr. 29.é.2Gf)7. mssgu. BY R1 ow THE IMPLEADING
APPLICATION FILED. BY"THE_PE'TITIONER VIBE ANNEXURE --~ 12)
AND ALLOW APPI_.ICA'I'i'O..N AND E'I'C.,
»»?:fH1s*PE111?iora.cQLr:1Na on FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B'
V' 'GROUP, 'l5'H3S"DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING-
ORDER
‘A petition is by a person who had filed
application. in a pending matter before the
A Deputjz Regstrar who was arbitrating over same dispute
t between the society and its members and which
‘ app1ica.tion had come to be dismissed with which the
petitisner is aggrieved.
9/
3 WP1 1417.07
2_. Sri. Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel _4for..3ithe
petitioner submits that during the pendency_–of
petition, the dispute itself has it ” it
resulted in an Award.
3. If the matter in which get
himself impleaded as a an nothing
remains in this Writ petition. the merits of
4. dismissed as having
become Kumar, learned counsel
for the.petitionerVsee1{s tietmission of the court to permit
question order passexl by the Deputy
‘ v ” ~ . V _}~
T5. uiwliile isio permission as sought for can be granted by
it is open to the petitioner to avail of any
i’ which is available to him in law and in a manner
V fknown to law and that independent right, if any, is not in
any way affected by dismissal of writ petition.
5/
4 WP11417.07
6. Writ petition is dismissed as having become
infinctglous.
An/~