Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008

13313239 3 Wm IR Tim Kamgfi or: cgrmamkm.

‘FE-{IS wan.’ %~i%&A<.:r:xm:::z<3&'%'::=:ij ma
1-'»§2L:Es.:mm Hmma. Ls * xs:;m1;:,éjmm mar, mm

mam mus THE mLLowm$»:

court seeking’ for
31531;: 5;? of ta quash the order dated

m.4.:f;:ac:;:– Imsgmaua, same’ 11 is

tax the pctitien. I have heard

u leameci counsei far the petitioner as
ma gm:..m.smmm, learned Axiditional
Aciwcxaxa far rmpondent 1123.1 and
leamed mammal for the

h V _ u Hr§sp@&&m1: 39,2.

L

J
a

I-‘HGH COURT OF’ i(ARNA¥’Ai(A HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH €

“(EH CQURT OF Kfi\RNAl’AKA HIGH Cj€Z3i%%€”? (BF ?€aM€E\Eéi§$’@2£’7n§€A Mfififi COME? OF KARNATAKA

2. The facts, which are net in dispute are that

‘egg pctifissaer is that mama: of an man: at’ 83 <::en3:'a_of

Land mm 33:. 15214 of Kenjaru Village, %
Taéuk which is acquired by the resmrnde:;t§" K
gmviflcrm of Penficicum '1

[A.<:qt511ait?1m:1 af right of user: Act

axquisitzixzm of the petttixrxxmez-53"' ather
bits mg lands in a
dated 31,12,19'?.'.?v 'fhc said Act.
'§'he paymegfi: an acquired
is praifified Act. The award
rclafirng'-ta" was passed

rm mi' " ta be awaited

V' *?3§ Vsougm fur refarmse of the same

V the same wm referred to the 2'14
. 1Z}.K., Mangalssrc in Miss. Case.
me Ems: court after cmsiderins the
pat faith 91: behalf cf the pctitic:-mt"

j caisimzm a the pctificm.

4

=?”ffIOUHT OF i(ARNflaTAKA ‘réifii–I I

%%§%”3H Céfffiém” GP KARNAYAKA !”fiIG%~i QGTLIRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HQGH QQEJRT O5 W%RNfl’fl’M{i& HE(T:”>%*”>-=”

3. The: learned cexmfiel appearing for the
pgtitésnar whilsa %iJing that judgament passed bgthe

Eistrict Smart waum contaend that in respmt cf ”
ather ianda wfich were agquimd under,
natifitwatisan igueé under seminfi. 3(‘1:§)

ea. ‘?.”?,:998 mm passir1g9t}f_1.e .

the fiistritzfi Ceurt), tfie K
higher acre and 10%
mm :23′ m 1: is thc
gievmam «:§f”1;i:saf 91′ the lamls
1;, ‘m aimilar, tha
cam;:er§:.;;fi3¢n figéiérmmbcd as 2 1&1-the per

aara Qf ‘s.;§i%&m9unt hag been paid. It is

V’ «:5: vé:.§iie§1′:.a%s$wa:is;}zc3; é i’ can-1111551 that in fact the
have treatcfi @313!” ‘ 13; and the
jlammizxt éetamnirzcd as in the said casc

gar %:~:+.g§;p3 shauid have been paid :9 cm petitioner

$

an
41

mm Comm” 0? mmnmm Hgcm cmzw W €€flRM#iWfi’Ln%%A a-mm comm out KMNAWM. mean COURT o:= KARNAYAKA HEGH comm” or KAWATAKA «mm c

in The iaarried counsel apgearing far the
msvpamfifit 139%: seught ta juatify the

mntsendm that the ea:-mpamsamn ”
éatermmad in acaardanca wan my and this ,

&ppmia2x-ad by the court j; ‘ 4′ »

§. In the fight sf’ a ‘V V

yemwi af aha judgsmnt belnw
wmzld inmate max to
£333 :::t¥£1%s::1t§ac§;17a5:’jA;r}£::Vis.c%1 the: date of
n£3tific»atian€.§1 and tlw date
9% 111%’: the lanai awnera in

teams’: hm bccn passed as per

E;sc,P;%_;fA:.’ ” behw thereafter noticed the

hack

gayest sf the gzefitinfiefa lang/Wis dated

$'{3%.Ai.:?é1′:3§?;5?:’%:t11=e subsequent mrtificaticn which is

F’?fie §;;;b3atpt%%mam~ 0!’ ma Ex.P8 is dated 717.1993.
_ ” ?§’$er?$;§’;:>z’%, the mart kelsw hm some :0 1:113 ganclusien
the mlexmt date for dctermxmng’ m:

V » : ‘£3$31$€E’}.%§.iflfi Wauid M the date af notificaticxn and as

is

WQURT OF KAQNATAKA ‘X-€¥C5H 1

iwififliwi €Z0U%7é”!” 0? mwmmm 3-‘HGH QGLJRT OF KARNATAKA H16-H COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT CW wwezwmmm i”§¥€?r

such mnaidermg the fact that there is a gap of mom

than 23 ycaxs bctwzazzn that 2 ncstifications, the ra1:é:~–.ax

which the market value Wm determined is ”
and zhsarefere the same did next cali far ”

can this aspect, 1 ® net find

tha mutt belmnz,

En Hnwever befZ::_;e “the
case an: -afiwt cf the ta be.

nsficai is . ware
acquired 5311;. in normal
marge witfnin a. remnablc

time gs had the bmefit of the

amagajg %.31.1£,in; iriéitant cafiefizhe award has hem

i..e., nearly mar 25 years from

It is needless to my that if the

_ Ii_11teré$£ éfio dsrxiecl E9 the psfitionsr, the same may
‘ No eioubt it was not open for the
Eacisw tn go ism this asgzaact ef the mattcr airme

fwhat Wm required to be d is the rate of

1-:

EGH COURT OF KARNATAKA E-HGH 0F E(AfiNfi;§”fiE(A HEQEH CQMW OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA t-HGH COURT OF E(ARNATN'(A HIGH C

wwenaaziafi. Hcwwer, Sacfinn 11 {2} 92′ the Act
wansuid infiicate: that in thg event cf there being

in paymaai: nf campenaafion, thc. ma avmar ”

enmaa far the inmmt @ ma per
this aspect mum have te be

view flit cfimtfltances to L.

§as.s;%z”ng me avmrdw ;agesené:y; it
appmguriate that the ‘permitted to
51% f=”%31″mni afi§:z; sccldng
intereast an ‘view :21’ Seciion
EH2} ilif is made by the
perm-;ne:;’% mg afi:er talfing new of the

the case pass appnapriate

thjza If the delay in msmg the

is the petifianers, the

i _ be iiwle tar gay interest on the
1_ of aamensafien dewrmzkied. Hence
‘ 2% rmwd tr: th: pctitianer tn gm: sppmpriatc
reggreamtatinn within a id Of 4 W:-31$ mam the

3 A. éaze sf rsaeipt ef the cap}; of 2.113 arder, Dr: such

12

EZEUR? OF KARNA”§”fi.Kfi HEGH n

%~%l@§~{ CQMR? QF KARNA}”AKflc. l~*I!G§-f QGMRI OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH QQURT 0% %'{£%fiMii’€¥AW\ r-HQ’

reprassntation being made by the pefifioner, the
1′!§Bpfi=£’%§a&fi?’B shall mnaidcr ané dispose of the aamn

an: way €33? the anther in aecordmme with ”

pezriod mi’ we months thareafcer.

‘With {ht above !’.=_

§€!t1*t£a::r1 sgmas dimmed 9:.

Rs crrfiex as tat: ._

‘F5/*