Sri Suresh S/O Mallappa Hugar vs Smt Shevantevva W/O Ranappa Mang on 8 July, 2009

' 3 V' 'Smt. S.l§¥:vzi.nttvva, H

Wp628?8.09

11¢ mm HIGH comrr or 1<ARz¢A1-Aim H  fT   

crnctrrr amen AT  , ff.  '_
mama mm Tim 313 nAY%:4OK"'¢§:L§..fi¢'§9'   T'  *'
mm         
-rum normm mz..Jus'r1cE  

w.r.No.62§sff8L§0_§.? "_L.*%%%'~3EIf¥cP*c1
Between:    

s/o Manappa H?--1ga;r;'_. '«   %    

Aged about45'y£-.a1s,---:~_V     

R'/at Mughalkbod,  " '

Tq: Mudh31;'T~., ' "7I::;   

Dist: Baga}ia. Mans.
'Agéti Ta"i3ot1t_A6§S'Vy§:ai$s,

R)'af'%M%u$ii8ikh0!'I;"'
Tq: ftiaidhej,   -

 _Dist: Bagalkoté.  anspoxnmrr

" " 9'  aanaim. Adv.)

'  "'I'f'his Writ petition is filed under Axficles 226 and 227

' fj .__ "é:f the Constitution of India, praying to quash the
T  cmcier passed by the Pr}. Civil Judge (Jr. D11),
  jMu<1ho1,passed in O.S.No.205/2008 dated 17.4.2009 was

" 'A1111exm'e-E, and etc.



Wp62878.{}9

This petition coming on for orders 

Court made the following:

1.

The court below, by the imp:t;gn:e erciex;

petitioner to pay the stamp    Aeefer-V.gettirig*.V: L'

the sale agreement 'dated     and

admitted in evidence.

2. The defené3q;j”t~petit§e.xter”«.tiereixilfeiaims to be in
p0ssessi0I1–‘sof; of the agreement of

sale dated gfeiies upon the recital of the

sale he is put in possession of the

‘~pr0p::f3;ty,»_ V”‘me.ems that the petitioner] defendant

this document to show his possession.

any dispute that, in case, the pessessien

‘is’? ‘;.otrer to intending purchaser, by virtue of an

0? sale, the same has to be reg’-stered.

t frhererom, the trial court is jusfified in holding that the

fsale aement cannot be marked and the same is not

admissibie unless the stamp duty and penalty is paid.
El/3

wp62878.G9

Hence, no gmunds are forthcoming to interfere A’

impugned order. Petition fails and is dismissed._. ~ V 4

Jm/-»