Sri T M Raja vs Bangalore Metropolitan … on 23 July, 2009

IN rm HIGH counw 01:' KARNA.'I.'AKA A'? 

DATEIB THIS 'ms 23"' mm 01? .Jt3Ly,1..:i_2fi3O§w5.';-~..f 

3:33 Houram  

ms ao1:~m.g 1~m..3v.1=;ssm;.DRA
J P mama 'z:.>dsf:e3  '
 -.-~_j56o_o'?~--.'5.
: " L. .. . .. APPELLANT
 ----------  cccxmox IN BOTH APPEALS)

L1'_{B;¥   5. mnmm, Anvs.)

 améeunm rmmomnxwm mmspom conpnrmrxofinz

, ,;~roa*1*H nxvrszoisz

" , Km}. RmD, 
"333: ms m'vIsIorzAL cozamomm
REP BY ITS CHIEF LAW omvxcm.

. . . RESPONDERT
(common IN 80393 35.13?E.AIaS)

(By Smt : H R RENu:v.)



mass I-rm:'1° APPEALS ARE FILED U/s--
KARHATAKA axcm CCKJRT ACT pmarma To 33': Asmva ma 
onnm PASSED IN THE WRIT PE'_I'.I.T_ION_--"143O*;.§i48'5'?';{2€?!04". 

C/W 3686/2005 mun 11108/20¢-6. " '_ ~

THESE A}?PEALS comma dis:  '-FOR 

HEARING THIS DAY, mnsmama '-.:.r,V  TEE"

FOLLGWIHG Z

The appe1JVLant's:' a. Memo
requesting t1:i's_§:., %l'a*:oz:£$;tgL'*.}.~£> 'hm. to withdraw
the     to approach the
      .

 » -      sdf.
]'u&ge

Séfw
Iuéqa