Posted On by &filed under High Court, Karnataka High Court.


Karnataka High Court
Sri T Subramanyam S/O T. Gopala … vs Sri D Rajkumar S/O Druvasvla Naidu on 28 January, 2010
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & S.N.Satyanarayana
" 'SR1'§D:7'}E§2&JK1.?E»f1XR,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATE!) THIS THE 28TH DAY or JANUARY 29 

PRESENT

THIS HOITBLE   E  E

AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC£ *S,N.SATYANA:fi'§§§YAr€1&

c.c.c.No.38o/zeioa tcmmé'  
BETWEEN:       

SRI.T.SUBRAMANYAM,

s/0 T.GoPALA NAID~U,.__ .   . 
AGED ABOUT 57  i   . ' 
R/ATNO.2, : -V   'V     .
RAJIVGANDHI LAY_ UT,  »  '

NEAR MARENA :émLLi=,x.__ _ .. "

VIJAYANAGAR, "  3' _ 1'; ' _  _

BANGALORE--~.~ 560'G40 .* _   ' --  COMPLAINANT.

{BY M[3_.:3.%R.ANAr§Tfi*§iA2§f<;SHNA
MURTHY 3; I-\S£-Zfl', ADVS.)

s/.0 DRLTVASVLAAVNAIDU,
AGE:.D'~AB0U'r .49 YEARS,

'   R/AT # "1000, R;'K;'HOUSE,
 SERVICE RQAIJJOPP. JYOTHI
 4NURs1N(:...AN.D MATERNITY HOME,
" * »  LAYOUT,
 _§_A1'*I.G-.AE-..0RE.  ACCUSED.

£.B_Y'"sR:.n}1.s.RAJENDRA PRASAD, SRAQV. FOR

A'   SRI.M.KRISHNA DAS, ADV.)

¥"Il=_$_=#___#___*



THIS CCC IS FILED U/S.11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF
COURT ACT PRAYINO To PASS AN ORDER INITTATTNG
PROCEEDINGS AGAENST THE ACCUSED AS HE HAS V'iOLeg'TED

THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE 

DATED 05.10.2007 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.1734/2.003..' '

THIS PETITION COMENG ON FOR 
SABH2AHITJ., MADE THE FOLLOWING}.  A. d d ' tv  

0 R nE.__R

Heard the learned co1;4nS.e1ap15ee:Ttng V} for the

complainant and the  Senicfir :Co'udnsel.0oappea11'ng for the

respondent.

2. dT1us c¢nRafipt*p§00on is ffled aflegnng udflfifl

disobedience the issued by this Court in Criminal

..’j’A;)pea}’§\;Fo.;;.?34A/ 2(h)O3v*«dated 05. 10. 2007.

“P§fotice.f{zvas issued to the respondent. It is

the entire amount has been paid to the

f@mmmmmmwmmmmmmmmtmn

__’the and the respondent are present before the

Court. Respondent submits that he has received the baiance
due to him and the entire matter has been settled and the

amount has been received in full and final sett1ement._y:of_V_the

dues payable by the respondent. In the

unnecessary to proceed with the respondent._–‘ ” ” if . ‘

4. Accordingly the contempt’ p’etitiof;._’ is

Respondent is discharged.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

93 queries in 0.171 seconds.