Sri Umamaheshwar vs M/S Gopalkrishna Trading Co on 10 February, 2009

W THE men COURT OF    . f  :_ A' 
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARW.A;D~w . _ '   L.
Dated this ihe Wm  of   "    'V J 
 Beferé --- A 
THE HOEWBLEMR JU.§2:ré’5′ HUL U:_r:}42;>;f’G RQEESH
 Pe:i’ii§n’ *2?-sje 5}iZ€}G8
Between:

SRi’U1\{A.MiA}fi_?.S1%{\7€AR . I

AGEI3ABUf:~:.41   1′  ”

s;o GA1’€ARAT3i§iI«Bi*EA’E .   »

0cc;3Usn~€:”3;fss~:i__  ” » _    ‘

PROPREETOR’ QB :~e=:i§?,\_;’,.::s;NA;:~:m. ‘3§RADL?’:E€3 co

me E B RoA9.T;23xrA’*£1i: BLQLDEQG

YELLAPLZRTQ     — .

UE”E’ARA :«,. ”

D§sIR1c’r..{K..=aR1v;aR}*«~  _  *
{Byfirit ;sUR:és:»: p’H:.;n3E::>AéAQD:, ADV)
-..  3353  TRADING co

= B}:?£E’ELN*I.?_i”– AM} PEP?ER Ev*ERCH?3.N’l’
 BY. ITS  SHRI RA3Z)HAKRISEiL%’~§§\

SEE? Mfiu\§JE3NATH SHANBHAG

AAA 66 EEARS {ECG BUSINESS
—  .. R50 D’? ROAD, YELLAPUR TOWN

” _ EJ”iST:U”£Ts%RA K..fisI~E’1\BA
PETITIONER
 RESFONDENY
CR1? FREQ UXS. 482 OF CRRC BY TEE ABVOCATE FOR TEE

?ETT£TE{§E\EER PRAYKG THAT THIS HOZ’€’BLE COURT MAY BE
W
PLEASED ire SET Asmg ?–m GRDBR DT.3}.1i}.2008 :aA§’é{i3:)*

¥ELLAp’t;::: Ex? C.C.No.559f2€305 {P11 I*~$o.?6:’2{305]_ M ;:F_i1-53:3 -IFOR ‘FEE’; ‘V 
OFFENCE UXS. 138 OF NI. ACT).   ~
THIS <:R£':vm~s'AL PETITION C01x§;:s_Ié—-.§$2~: 
DAY, TEE COURT MADE TEE 1?o:,Tz;,§3?x2g11~z<:«:' – ~ V

  "iflkm

Learned counsei afipegfiing if< 3r  seeks perrnission to

Withdraw the petiti-rm, :,.g¢§;;3d gut of com;
Accordingly, thé_pet§iibn is disn5.~issed_a wiflidféwh.
-5d/’3:

Jud<.'-F5
Share this:

				
				Facebook
			

				
				X
			
Like this:
Like Loading...


	
Related