High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Umanatha Prabhu vs Sri Lawrence D’Souza on 15 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Umanatha Prabhu vs Sri Lawrence D’Souza on 15 January, 2009
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit
3

Efé *m§:: E~Ei{}H C{)UR'E"" <2? KAR§'$fi{}'&KA AT BAr;{:;;A§,é§a ~ 

§A"I'E£} THES mg 13% my 9? ..:ANz%5Am''A<.fi@0g:%. "' 

?R5SaN?f

THE H{}I'€'BLE MR. RD. Qz2§AK.A:é:.§J\§,--.¢;f:%§§1--i%_--;ééu"gf:%_:a:E§"--. 


mg HG§'sE'8};E ;~;§3f%,gU§;%:"E<'§§--s?;'s:;,Sm§§;=»;.--E~£¥:=':

WRIT' APFEAL ':-4'.c§:';z§:9§1;éé::3s:}L*;' .
BETWEEN:   " " V' 
§ SR1 Ugakémafga P942835  if) "" H
?a mg, 3-5:) A;E: A£?§'E? P€)S'E'_, '§~€$£?:KAL& Appmmm
mxsazzm ';<;s.;a:3g;a;:;x..§.;3'rR:<:'r.

gay 3:33: A KB-Siégaxggi §§;§A';:~--"': ;

    ..... 

L’ .3 f ~ _S§Q.§ L3§;%¥rRiENCE WSGLEZA

AA _ 1.33:;

-_ Sf’*3’*T3AB§EiE*EL 9 $93222
. ‘R/<3 'KEPULU EN SAEOQR
ViLL;'%.G*E, PG gameg
:§m*<:_K.za:.A

jg Qvgag we"? 5 301523 3211

Qffi PEEL}? B SG{§Zz%.

SANOGR ViLLAC’rE
E{ARE~<IALA

2. W.P.No.29823/209} Wash fiieé.-“b3*« ::j’_§1 e::

respondent herein seeking for .'(Z’t1″(?VI1€3?””§§V¥§i§?;’»_Sst*;:’}z”‘

by the Land Tfibtina}, §{ark9ia.._\date€£A.V_};i}.8.1’?vé§85 is: 1:58

contexztian of firm patitiaxzer the the
appeiiaflts herein were <§;:Cuf3an-::j.='
righi: in respect Q f dif1'e;f¢_13i_ has been
50138111 £01' inf,' {fled hefare the
Tribunal. by the nenxgrant af
occupafiifitfv N07!' in respcct of
Nct£?é.cn is that {ha Txibunal has not cmisiéerad {Em

‘ agfgplicatiaa flied by the writ petitioner accatfiance with iaw

” Siild £316 01:14;-tr is passed 3113. C{)E1tI’3V€’I3.¥.’i9E1 sf {ha abservaiiarms

made in the susrveyofs repazt and; the findings thereen and

W

survsy report. However, so far as Sj;r7}I§Fo.5′?{_1’i’5’i§::cQi1{§t:i*;1t§”

according to survey report, the fappeliagit A’

pessessiofl and cliltivation ofV394__CenfS..a’3i>:i 42;C{*;§3.t:$ wais :Ei1

occupation of the petificner. ‘vi44ixt;f;12%cV¢r, has
(301:1.f€I’I’€d occupamzy to
the extent 0f 1 1 cgznts ‘ :%_{j¥;%§..§.pa1!3.c}; fight ia
favour of the ‘l*”‘G cfints and
filerafore, rffibunai couié not be
3usiainVé:fi:”VVa::=;;§f, ‘V wé;§””‘1i$b1e to $3: 33*: asidfir.
A€co:’di£ii1g13},«’.’®& Judge has set aside fiw aide?

of {ha’E’ribi::s.a}”;L:1VV:s f;%r’~.é;s 2: reiates ta Sy,E’€0.§’7f1fi and

maiéérr»-.?.a«:h€ iand °’E’r5?b:ma§ ta 2:€<::eI1sid&r {he

3225-it'ierA a€f€S§i§fi.*–f€Sp¢Ci 0f Sy.N0.3?'/ 18 aion-8 and I'€"éf$Cid€

Elia hmaitér in View the smvay $6901': which has been

ffiffifgfifji the order 3116 thereafter, sonsifier the gram: of

x V' Qécfigafiéy right fig E'€$§£i'5€3i of the Same. 'f'ha£ bang aggrieved

— said mtzier passed by {ha ieaztmid Siflgie Jtzdgss: dated

” ‘°9′. 3.20G’? {ha secomi mspcnéent in {he Writ petitieza has

preferred this appea}.

$3

petiézlarzer-{ha first respmléemz hereia and ?G– ii§ §”av§3uf ” u

of the appeliamz herein. Even “s..3*1<}'ug};1 ac-soxféiéfig {Q *s::~:¢% "'.'§§1_;.57}a11d: the
Tribuna} has 3133 matfirial an
fficaré in 3:3 fag: $6 ap;:)e}Ia11t»-iths
firs: x*z4:’s»-;3::>:}%}’LV€;»:}x’.:;€”‘=bf Sy.N0.§7/ 10 and
t}1erefo;%§,W€h”::: Singla Judge that this

i)I’d€i” oi;2′?§1’é 336 Sat asifie in S6 far 223 it

rériates to Sjg%’;’Ne:)V;E’>2?/V-.1§’–i§.3Vj~*{;sfifiec%. The leaned Singifi Judge

‘~ }3as..’:;{?i*gh;§.1f§ zfsmjtiééti matter 1:0 {ha Lané Tribuna} and has

ta recafisidar the mairter afresh is”;

réspéét o:f’ :33$§’N0.5?/ 1 alanfit 3:36. rewdecide the mafia?

keepiizg View the S”U.I”u?’€i}f report which has beefl referred to

‘figs éfifir of the lfiafflfid Singie afudga and thersafter

‘ <:ht;;1b$i§:1er {ha grant cf csccuyancy right in respect 0f the céaim

" hfifiada by the appiicazits. Thii appxrfiheinsiozi of the learflad

cmmsei appearing far the appeflant that the Tribunai would

w

&_ h01:i'5if.113_L§ ifherzé Z§1.§)j Ii;1€I"i'i in this appeaé azzd pass the

flqllcwfmg t3rc1*::fiV __

Ciispase of thématter only on the bas§§ of the
not well founded, the order cf ..

wouki itself Show that after co:;.sidéfi?1§§’the %V
the Tfibunal is 3130 requirsé “{)c.: éo:;s1{£€$’:’ _t§i§ .= 0:1
mcord and thextafier fight 3&3
r&s};}e<:t of Sy.No,5'?/ 19 §é'i.{"ii€iS is
substantiam '§'rihufia}: angi
therefers, '{}ii£: $33; the ieammd Singie
J11 ége fig. «'fiéi§i"'3ii1ff'er from any tirrsr er

ué mason to {iifikr with that

View t3};<er3,u'A ihe lea;r:;é£%.:_"€5iI1g1e Judge azld accardmgiy', we

2 is dismissaai. ~.

Chief Eustice

sa/3;

Judge

index; Yes} Ni}