IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE oath DAY OF AUGUST, BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. rUs'1:1<:3 Of L PROB.CP.LN':(DO.5;'2_O09." ~ « 1 O BETWEEN: _ SRIVRAMESH , V' ~ s/0 LATE VENKATA SETIY ' - } AGEDABoU"i'56'f;T!T;ARS--¢ R"/ANO_D5§6/'?"O,V"av-7:-- ' DRDO RESIJ:)EN'§;f_IAL 'COMPLEX C.V.Rr'11\rIANA:I'§AG}¥?1" " f BANC;ALoRE4'5;iD.Q93P. _ - ' . PETITIONER (By's:;:.T.K1iIs1§T:NA,TVPGS\? A5STs,) "N'IL* V A RESPONDENT
-. 1 (By Sfifi/L.SUDIIAKAR FOR C/R
* _ ‘vsra CPRAKASH FOR C/R)
THTS PETITION IS FILED UNDER PART VII AN IX OF THE
P P ” ‘P LWDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER TO
PROVE THE WILL IN COMMON FORM AND THAT PROBATE
CV
20
THEREOF TO HAVE EFFECT THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF
KARNATAKA MAY BE GRANTED TO THE PETITIONER.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the
the following; 3 V’ ‘
r1z;p_.I;+_KL
Learned counsel for the petitioner*;’_’file:d airrrerrrlo reclueiltiirrg
to recall the order dated 3.2.20-v1:Q”~and ro VdisI31Aiiss_:thefietirion as V
settled out of the court: The pléllcedllon record.
Accordingly the order recalled and the
main petitioglijs :disfi:;il§.lsed:_lé1s_lserfledlout of court.
séis-‘4
JUDGE
A. …..