High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Venkataiah vs State By Jayalakshmipuram Police on 25 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri Venkataiah vs State By Jayalakshmipuram Police on 25 January, 2010
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh

” V#’IW’t\I VI’ I\I’!I\I1.!”1lr\I\r”I ‘II\lI

r ysfunr vs £\l”Il\l’4P’l!:l”‘!l\l”| r1n.’.vr1 Luunu ur !\I’l!\l’1l”\ll”|l\l”l |”‘1l\3’l’l LUUKI U!’ HHKIVHIAISM HIUH COURT OF

I1»: mm mm: com’: or mmsmsrnm arr

BATED mm THE 25″ DA? <_I?E,, J_Pa€(I¥§RY ?_ {¥i't§ " 'V

BEFORE V
m I-row BLE am. ££U'S'1'IiVI_Z_E—.V..I-IUI;tI'q73V:*s1}I' %§.?§m5H5

BE'I'fi§EEfi

1 $12.: vENK:v;':a:A3:' '
SKO "

RIG Nu. 1.22;, 3333, ‘mm'”Rezs.n

1~z’rsc;;a£__

2 Mo:-ma’

Sm VEflK§1’&\ZEl£_

AG;§.::’32 233%» .__

2.2:: 39,122, mam

” .31′: Q’r:x3E,,_ GGKIffI.AM
A .-tm~:Tc3E * x ‘ ‘-

3
W)’-Q sggnvmamg
A€rE-:48; ms
~ %.:s,z.;o 2»a::.122, 333 mm new
zzfim swam, mmm
fi’:f3ORE
I EETITIQKERS

“‘-.,_ ‘ ;gny S225. : 9 m, ADV ;

AND :

1 STATE BY JAYAIAKSI’E’II?U3Ps3§ ._
PGLICE; }I’:’.’E’sf.’I|R.E ‘

2 RARE! rs
AGE:35 ms ‘ V %_
# 253. 121.3 $12055, 2’:s:1::”%s*1*AGz.._
racsmlxu-2, mscage

3 mm 5/<2 azzxsxzaz =_
AGE:28 212.3 -_ 3 '
a 122, 21521:: _ST1F:¢;4K"~..'j %

4 smzI1:;m:::%9z1a- 3:3.imI:z.:;
"

#5 122 %..” x mm ;3*men.¢%%
cscgmmza, ‘ u ‘ %

5 I.c«F?.E$I7+l ,Vs””.’.*¢.5i’£:£” 4
_1,3,EI4ETEE3Vf£S:” nmzn . 2 9-~7 -»-2 co 9

V’ A 3′-‘[ ’31amI**::fAs é’i’i’;3″‘2émImnEvu’

é %%nGE=%33A%”¥ns
# ,.2–§&. <;1mss,2m:s amass
"..c+a:€u:;. zu«:, ' HYSGRE

a DRIVER mama
Sm ~' JAVARAIAK
" 268, 12TH amass, 2ND STAGE

VA &'r.;aim..a2-s, zczscm msmmms

jay Sri. : we 3 mm mm R2–R4 5-. R5-R'? s Sri

mu:-4 LUUIU ur auucwmnua mun LQUR1 OP KARNATAKA HIGH CQUR1 OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH

3; V S%, H€IG£ FOR R1, R5 DELETEB}

CREME? FILED U/3.39'? R33}. 4531 C'.'I{.}?.C BY
33$ AEVOCATE EEK flfi FETITEDKER FRAYHJG Tim?

W

HIBH LJJUKI U!' MMENMIHRH:-:-Hi<avr9't<a;w3uw!-1'-'wIrf'=as.v~\nnHlHnn -nlun-uuuuv -vr an-nnentnnn ruwrs uuutu ur nan-IV-HI-an-M flfurl t..Ul.'.i'Ki 'Ur' KAKNAIAIQA HIGH"

1?:-1:5 I-ION'BLE c<:1u*1=:r MAY 23 91.33932 TO
mm mmam: amnn n'r.29,.1.o7 233353-.'_T%;:% :1: T'
c.<:.x~:e.2?2.f02 on nae FILE ' §3§"* .'_I'I«~$

C$URT; MYSQRE.

‘Ims mwsnaxi 13 <:<::2»: :'T::1s'se
3:1-113 DAY, 'rm: GOI3RT;–1f!P§.m ,'32'£*$ _:

This ' order passed
by the …. C.C.N”i;:£z;aiii:s harem chosen ta: -come up befam

‘§..f_’tAAh.i%s4..AAcai’£1rt by filing this rsvisian.

Heard. tha lemma Counsel few the

petitianers: learned H Cimmsei fax: the

‘E,

raspcazzdents and the learned Governmazifi-. ~

far State.

3. The menwuent to CT;_::i;=:;;i.:2ai” ..C”¢de * L’

Camfi ifitfi afffifit Q59-fg~éi*12f2ifi§§_Vébction
29 pravides for fifi@§dm§g%gf5 $§a:ian 372 of
€r.P.C. nf 1§?3’u§éiei§ §£;!%@ngfifi#latea that
the victgmish§§;”hg#§_zx ®i§fl£ to prefer an
appeal,ag§i#é$g§fifj§$§&%Mp§aaed by the court
aaquitfiing’Vfifiafw§u¢fi$§d; bxT eanvicting’ far a

laaaer ‘c££qn§aR e£i imgm$in§ inadequate

»,camga§$$tien $35 finch sgpaal shall lie to tha

A”;;ofirtV §9.”&fiigh, ths appeal ordinazily lies

a§aia$fi £§g’§£dar of convictien af anch aourt.

x i§wx’*Xn Ntha instant case, tbs a¢¢u3ed. ware

A -fafigfigéahseted far the affancas punishable

Sections 143, 44s, 42?, 342., 323, 324,

Hlfii-H CODE? OF KARNAIAKA HEGHACOAURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C OUR? OF KARNATAKA I-HGH COUR3 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH

11% read with Saatiaa 1&9 af I96. The victims

being aggrievfid by tha créer of acquittal

EV’

“eh-II ” \auVcI’olI\? ‘all !\a””\r\l1rIlrI!\r’I ‘I!\.7l

.- n…_,\.:xwnr vi l\l”Il\lV!”Ill”‘|l\l”‘| nnun \–V.ILJI\! vr IV-\l\IVl-\IMr\.H. nnwn \.\J|J!(l ur l\l-\I'{!’lI-\I.F\i\I’\ HiUH COURT OF KARNATAKA

passed, had tc; prefer an appeal
Appellate Court in View of_…1:h4a
Seatian 3′:2 C’:r:.P.C., the

intxseadnced ta ena.b12e’ __ “i:.1;e 51:0 = L’

agpzraach thus £31.:-m:__ 21′:az12.-*:At_:____VVé::§£E_ ‘a.;gpa.:§i«..1;3*VAvvffiling
an awpaal, which i5″‘-1;i;>zzfz§.If3}§; f$i:éfe::ed against
the czcder of 4¢’c:_;vic:€’i’e:i’;.

5. 312:; …. the revisian is
di3po8 i=3fi : €o£.V§é?i:t.§:iA .Tii3c;é”xtj»;? tn the corcglainantw

petitianézfi _t§’V.$ an appeal am providad

uSu€¢’:ti$V2’i’»%ifV$____é;f’3f the amandment ta 6.13.9.6.

cf 23937 ..

the zsrecarcis fcrthwith.

Sdfii
fudge

zwk:’*””