High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Vidhya Niketana Education … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Vidhya Niketana Education … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2008
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
AND ALSO SR1 SHARADA VIDYANIKE'FANA"El¥"C3§I;I§1"'   --
PRIMARY SCHOOL, NANDAGOKULA Lafggmf 'I'H A.Hi

SR1 MARIYAPPA RAMAIAH CHARri'Aa_LE

TRUST. RUNNING RAMAIAH PRIMARY scfioing  X

MADIKAL, cH1KKABALLAPURA,'Ko.1,AR A 
REP BY ITS SECRETARY'SF2{ P R SRIi'J1V£i$    
s/0 RAMAIAH M, AGED Aagm 52 'IEARS; "

sq' PAULS EDUCATIQN TRUST'   
RUNNKNG SAINT PAULS :3C1§-§{)O--L_' DA~N_EIL'S C()'I"I'
AGE (:22, MAIN Roan,' 'PEm's:sA1§D.RA " 1.
CHICKBALLAPURA  5&2 101, RE?" BY rrs
SECRETARY, As E}UDERSHA~N',.._ % " '

AGED AB_OU'}i'~4f? YEARS '   

S/0 SIJNDARAM '      '

   T  
R?JNNINC+.*QUITE QORNER -SCHOOL

3 157/ 1,' ?éOI'€'f'}IAAEX'I'"E.'£*I'SI(>N, CI-IICKABALLAPUR
FOSI', KOLAR 1a1",~E~EPREsENTED BY FPS
PRESIDENT, "Radar; YARGHESE T

s_/_() '1' M VA:2<;«EE3r;;' AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

   ..... .. V
. ., RU1~a.m.;qc;vAsAvI VIDYA NIKEPHANA
"'JALASAHN&_. STREET, NAGARATH PET

 CH'E{'T{{.Br'£L'i;APUR 562101, REP BY ITS SEC

" 'V .k§3 

A V M N_ Kraisflnan MURTHY 310 NARYANA SHETTY
""--AGEB -ABOUT 50 YEARS

ms.r<:L1NE AND JOY RURAL INTEGRATED

'  '-DEVELOPMENT

V'  TRUST, RUNNING SAINT JOHN SCHOOL NO 986

10

SADHU MUTT ROAD, CHICKBALLAPUR KOLAR
REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN R HENRY PRASANNA
KUMAR S] O J RATHNAM AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

SR1 CHITRAPINAKINI CHARITABLE AND
EDUCATIONAL



CHIDGHANA SWAMIGALU  

s/0 G B SWAMIGALU AGED ABOUT 57%.   _: "  

16 SR! RANGANATHA TRUST  _'

RUNNING SR1 RANGANATHA H"iQH.fiR: P1émAiéY   A

SCHOOL HANABE,   = ._ _ ,
DODDABALLAPUR TALUK-.,BANGAi;'.C1RE    
REP BY ITS SECRETARY  *  * -- -' 
H v SRIVATSA 3/ O, R G VENKATRQHALAIAVH 
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS   

17 SR] VENKATESHWARA 1:Di:'cATE-QNATE. AND
cHARrrABL.r3--'rRUS'l" ~  "  1 'V " 
RUNNlNG~vS'T~.R'EB Rocxs CONVERT?

NO *?o,_ 1.5.,c1?;Q$s~,. A BLOCK, BHUVANESHWARI

NAGAR',  ROAD masts, BANGALORE 23
REPRESENTEIE By rrs 3E"C.R§rAR§*
DR PRA1{A'3HViS/07$)'G'§2AMUS1t;" '
AGED';ABoI5R':3.3.,_    . j

.. . PEFYTIONERS.

(By Sri P  suaafia, .AA'DV.  ) 
  V  ..... 

1 '  ST_ATE-v._OF. KARHATAKA
REPRESENTED BY" ITS SECRETARY
PREMARY A1530 EQUCATION , WDHANASOUDHA
ma AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE

if  L *m£~; DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSFRUCFINS

  _DEPERMTENT OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
 'EILLA PANCHAYATH OFICES

 V TUMKUR SOUTH
VV '"'l'UMKUR

 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC

INSTRUCTIONS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC EDUCATION



ZELLA PANCHAYATH OFFICES
TUMKUR NORTH
4 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFCPUBLEEE  .: «

:Ns'1*RL¥C'r1oNs   ..   ' ' 
EEPARFMENT 01? PUBLIC EDU_CRTION  * =
BANGALORE NORTH TALQK ' 

K G ROAD, BANGALORE», 

  ;é'Esm§aDENTs.
(By Sri B. MANOHAR,   ) 
THIS WP FILED 1J'i§bE'R AR?;'1<_;E'Ls«'226 AND 227 OF
THE CONS'FI'E"U1'l§GN,.P12fi§YiNG"lfO" "QUASH ANNESXURE
01 TO c17,:ssu__ED. .33? mp: ~RESP() NI_)ENT.

THlS_PE T'I'}'E§)N »<:o§viI'rsi~Ga._.oi§*~: FOR HEARING THIS
BAY, THE COAURT 1siAE).E' '1?_r-m 'FOLLOWING:

   

The péfitjonsfs fi5'e {;:uestio11i1tzg the notification issued

 "  by   regarding the language policies.

2}  " It   for this court to go into the merits

 _of   in as much as the subject matter is squazcly

   a ruling of this court in the case of Associated

 Nfiafiiéigcments of Primary and Secondary Schools in

"  vs. The State of _Karnataka, by its Secretary,

fl



6

Department of Education and others, reported.' 

2008, K81'. 2895. _
3. Having regard to the fact that 

said notifications have been  ' 

and following the    petition stamcis

disposed of qaashing  
4. Mr.   appearing for the

petitioncréé    pétitioners have made

app1i{:éfi{)t1a.  register their schools for

. thc   the acadcmiac year 2009-10. It is

also  S  applications are given before

 '~     the cut oflflate.

   V_Vti1a--{:iatc of receipt of the copy of this order.

  régatd to the fact that the appfications are

 k?i:$fl8idCIBti0fi, the respondents are duectc-.d' to

A.c(>1_:zsiie:r¢ the same within an outer limit of three months from

‘hugs pi’

W}

The matter stands remitted to the concerned
authorities for fresh disposal in accordance with
mgaxti to the decision of the Full Bench. L VT A4

Petition stands
Mr. B. Manohar, “A. ” to file

memo of appearance ‘A ”

vge

AJGJ : W.F.No.1095?/2007″.

06.01.2009 e
ORDER ON ‘FOR BEING SPOKEN TQ’

At the request cf the = _ ‘4

Advocate the matter is listed ‘for beif!:9:4SP?’*’§én”&t9i Vi’ ‘A

It is brought to my notice i£le:1f£_icai’.= ‘

after quashmg’ the ._the fiiattex’ is
remitted tn the concerned the

same is not in: ‘order. The

following orde.r:

concerned fresh disposal in
to the
decisiofi pfzrzezm

.# –

Judge