High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Vikranth @ Vicky vs State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Vikranth @ Vicky vs State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2008
Author: N.Ananda
1% was HIGH swam? as xakmawaxa, aamaabmnx
mawxn THEE was QWHVRRY my Aral; zaas
msraas
THE fiBN'ELE MR.JwsTIcE Jfi,3NAfi3R *3~ 
Crl.?. wm.1ma4i2éQa;~.3
Ezrwzsm V
333 EKKRRETH 3 VICKY,
3K3 fiRTE fiflflflfifi KRQ,
AEEE Anna? 39 vmnxa, _
RWR? fl??. ERKMEL H1§H
scaama, MQGflRhAPAbYR,

vxaaymmaaan, V I ,1 ',;_ ;a_>
aauaaaana -- 5fi%'@?$+ 3 g V? " °.T.+--& yawzwzawzn

£BY'fiI §uFAL"s:méH§;33¥;?§» }'"

$32

$mAmE flf K"R&R§$&A]E%"""
Gxfllfifififik Fflhififi 3TATI$&y" ~~* RESQGNDENT

v_§BY 3Ei_fimmmAP§A;wa¢§F§

»_  '=Tasg :aa§;a_s, FXLEE uxs $39 aa.§.c. anvxma
H3fV?fiES"fifiN*§E$ CGHR? may BE FBERSEE Ta RE&E&$E
wan *gw:@:aN$a* mm amxa Em and wa.13x6e my

 * -v@IR1fiAaAR_§s;,"aM THE FIbK aw THE :: Afiflb. CHM,

Rflflfiflfififlfig wfilfifi ES REGISTEREB FGR. THE QFFEfiCE

__n__£QfiI$HAfi&E; mmnsm swcmxmma Eéfl, 147, mas, 34:,
*«j$33¢;&Q?*%xw'$Ec. 149 my xyc.

V": *§"'"§:3'iIE E"§3'§'I'i'ZIZQN CC5§»3T.f'§5S QN FQF; C3RI'.1fiER$ 'F"£r'I3LS HEY,

V "TfiE EQURT MADE THE Fwuaawxmmzw



512::-mfiideting backgrmanm éitf s:sa::.':11m~esm:sa6; and

allegmtiwnm againat patitimnerg E am 0f View

at that ataga, theta is mm pzima faaia aaaé;

agaimax patitiamwx fax %%E"mff&nc3 pun;gh&g;§_L ,

under Sawtimn 3%? afi E33.

3* haawrfiinglyg gatition i3Va¢¢eQte§; '.

?atitimner 13 Ealaa3afi. %n bfiii '3ufijé$£""t¢

fmllawimg a¢fiditian$:~,

1.

Tha gatitisnafigfihaiiyexfimqfifi band far a

sgfi”fi£_$%;£§€§§$fau%fifi ahall wffer tww
3gre§i3# f£@rfi t§e like sum ta the
.V fléfififaafiifin fig aammittal cwurt.
‘;;'{JTha«§a£it£&§ar ahali net tamgar with as
‘ ‘. §fifi§§i§ata gxaaaaufiiwn witnaasaa.
.’ §L T%é-kfietitiwner ahall regularly attand

‘.tn$§e Ccurt.

sa/-gm
Iudge

3’7»?