High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Vivek Kumar Jain vs State Of Karnataka on 24 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Vivek Kumar Jain vs State Of Karnataka on 24 March, 2008
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri


IN HEIRH COURT OF’ KARNATAKEE AT BANGALORE

1″3m’1’Efl THIS THE 24%: may 01? MARCH

EEWRE

THE 1-£r::1~a”aLE MR. JU~;s*.rIc’:E ASHQKB. H1Nc£:iGERI.k % k

Wm PE’TITION NO..1?’956 oFj20s37’~V

.’}R?;’*!.’.”‘i.-“EEK ..;mI.;m..Ia Jam .
s;mm.m’1wDRA MGHAN
mnu’s:mm1..Is*r- – _ 3 ~
rm. 132:3′, MuN:1:mRm:– 1′._!’IDU-3T” –* §:3;f’r’A’:’*I3 ‘V ”
m1mm;E,3.ANf3fiLs:a1a;E Emu ” ” ‘
nmmm .. – ~

t{E.’:TF!’_ amx; ADV. ,1

1′. 5-mvm-‘ cm”

§;e«::IJJH_a

– J.mu:cam.xmRE, Fo”E’.E’IitE3l§2I5l”I’Eli) BY m-3

3 =iL’:»’i .?!};fflrE$$.§:I{}flE fi {.’v’%TRIE?- :’–‘.1’u”J ‘JG}.{}-{ERCE

‘ A _m1~zaf3»§;re.1;c:ra1L=:.;’=:(@

53,. A V SPEEIFEL. SAND AC’-QUI8I’I’I€)H OFFICER
INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT
PLQT 140.3335, LRKKAMANAIIALLI

_ IWI3E|?s«TRIH-L AREA, P.V.RCmI}

‘ 559904

mm-1.-r1’raaa I:.”~i’J??..-‘$:1″:’.'”””m.:n::.¢”‘ ” nu.’ “Efi

ILIEVE LIDPMENT BOARD

FIJDT W0. 33f A,

IJMDII STRIAL AREA,

P..’a?.H*|Z3hA]Z}, DHARWAD 580034

MANAGER RE3P(.’}NDEN”I’B

hi

(Eff: SM ‘R.I3|..5.§ATHYANARAYAI’IA SIIHGH, I-I(.’.{}P, FOR R-1
E-F.I EX.1″‘s.’IE~’EIi.”+HEI”I’i1, 1″.I’fii”‘., FGR R43 -35 R-3
£51′-21 Pfluflfilflflflflflflsflfifififi. ADV” FEJR R-2)

*1*~1’-113 ‘DLFRIT PETI’.I’I€}II’I 1m1a:1::u UNDER AR’rI_c;i;.r=:§ A’
AND ::e=:r’.?’ xzzw” ‘I”EIIE’» cvouswruwzmn IDF INDIA Pmvms ‘T0 [. ”

¢’.,”,5!.I.=!’+.$H.’ J”-.;!’!I’!T?r.EFXT..¥1′-$!§.3-£’..”~’» 28″ 1239135 I3$.UE’J.E’.!”_

nEsPn:;::1ra”xm:.wa*r Iwcvrnrwmc; THE SCHEAIDITLE :5. 3:;

‘I”k’m’-‘l”HI’W”|I”:’II”,i 11″ A J”‘0.I”~.I’ 7″I”l§’I74- ‘fl|r’\’II’j: ‘I’*'[,I”I1’n’-

-nun _ an nf.:mn:nr:-1%! ~r\’I’}– mu ”
I’.i’K-‘\.a4’I”JU|’.fi”s1I..!l5″Fu’3F .u”‘.’|-3l’.’l.IbI l’1’\..#’~¢ULIKKr 1″‘-J’I’5. I-;I’.l=.l3r 13-_ ‘-“.”_-I’ _

QED RE-$P{}NDENT.


'aims Pmmrgm cnmtrmk mi Fem  VA

 
..m11tImu.1gh the    Ear  I have
taken. fit up few"    of the

n ;n.n_}uu.n..J .n. vl-Lu..-umua’Iau;n.1.a1 l\.n..-n I-.n.
111.53? I. I-U

writ petition. Ha submits

flag notjflnatinn in mapeczrt of the land in

quéetitinh “gamma on -:a2.2.muo5;2a.12.2ms-, the

;;..:.aLa }g;1+.=..1=–.ss.I.=aI3~;1 mes Mid lam… on 9,:;Lm5= Ag

pifliitiwner ‘nan. p1.ut:n:a’ marl the lama” qumfiflfl

;éuVEaac:ngu¢x1t t;»:: that date nf the issuance of the:

.’pmJi2nii:1ar3.~ m1’a’.ii”n:-ation, the petifianmr has ml right to

f’1’BH

‘.9

mint me am-qufsaitiazm per aw, hia entitlsmesrnt is only to

racnaiwm the compensnfinm.

$3.. In support of his VH§.ubrni86ic–ijs;’

Charfimshalcar has» relied am a fail

this -Emu-t in flue case VA

m’n..m:am an-upmmmflvn &OQfiSi?1?’w.1fa. ®
mum 3:141, wmresirl pa on who
tlrjm a,ubEq:a§§1’Lagant’ traf the
nn3tifi.n.s:ati;m..1;§i’1£1§*5f:’1=?’;3§ar.:tL-:i§tz.:f1-{1}~-.-::f_ Land Acquisition

1′-‘mt, m tlma acquisition

fawur. He has aim: relied. on a

Hnt1″|rJ1e Apex Calm in tha case of

w.:4mim.; -nmcman rm cmmuu

Vs. mm» mm rnomnrm gr; 1.1-1:.

L!;:;r¢¢1%r.;g..«;a’eu:;Is..1s::.= mum ……..I_I .=*=m«r|’=-:1 ‘n .J.l…..

-an ‘Il’£J”a’ -wv–u-5 mam.

LL17 , 1asr’ma.rs&:.r1_ ‘ ii is Tmici um” i: a party’ ” who has

‘V V _’4_”:.V;*:.”zV:’z¥’c:.’ic.1z.e:¢m+.-**,{»:l the pmrmxty aubaaque-nt to the issuance of

the 1I:I”IE1€3′;|f1’1l'”LiE11£i.I’].-* uotfificatian, is nnly -mtitl-excl 11: step into

F1314.

tht: tss1’1o«.aa1 «of the owtrmr and claim the payment of

11.

4., being the aim position in_-‘ldwgiiii % k

thja patitium. Haadlaaa to obaenm *-[A

mattitlmi m mm -five fair and A’ -9.19}: %

fl a A I
immi W.-15r&.i11§g: up his i1’ikiu_$*.1~3v_._V mamas’
am.-h an ayg«pli:1E§t£¢~i1;_tI1g:;’VV’19§éaa§§zc@’:’z£:11.t_ Rn;,;_i’}i-KI:°LDB shall

mrmiuie.-Jr with law and

fiflwfflimm’ is ~51 lower.

5. % we «mrdeé

‘ V, ‘Vat: