Karnataka High Court
Srikrishna vs The Commissioner on 4 November, 2008
nu VII I\rII\I'u-'I-uu--n nuunn Ma!-FIJI': 9: I\r1.l\I'Il-\Ir'II\r'l -I r 'maintain! 'an nu-nun':-ur-uv-1 'III-Inn union': 1': nrunnvu-um-uu-n III-gnu \nr\I\II\l \Il n\r-nuIr1I.wu'\.r~§ ruur! Kala!
IN THE HIGH sonar or KARNATAKA, mAN3ALggj ] u
%$EB THI5 THE $3 max 53 NovEM3EgW 2§68; '* "
322333
THE HfiH'fiLE mm. JU$TI¢E RAvienmL:nA:3'~'
wax? yfirzrxmu Ha. 2?294W§r.2ao4u@La¥nfisiW
BETWEEN
an: Efiififlflfi 1--_ 1 .« ,,_ ._«
asap ABG¥T 5a;YEaas ~_ g~* >A":=-m;
9:53. g§HTEDEE'E.u
KQLAR n:swa:c$; , *- "*2 =.. =_~
V."'e. '._,,; yzrxrxeunn
=7i;. 5§£Ew£snnIs$:dHER
»j*»HUmIc:2A§_con9@nArI0N
' KfiLER=?Qflfi, KDLAR.
"*~2. ',fHE,fi3év%2 COMMISSIONER
apaagfsxswazcr, Kaman
f *§,i*= was eevnnnnmxr 03 KARNATAKA,
'.,3z ITS uxnan smcnswaaz,
'nwszne Ann URGAN
mnvgxogmmnw, BANGALORE m1.
... nssroxnsnws
THIS W? FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 Afifi 227
£213 THE €f€3ZfJETITEITI£3N' GE INDIE PRAYING Ti} DIRECT
TEE RESFSNBBN8 TQ '$C3NSIBER THE REPRESENTATION
GI'é'E23*¥ BY 'I332 PETITIQNER VIBE P;HN'E3EURE-Pa.
Q/'2<"
H V)IV.lVNllV)l :10 181103 H93!-i VXVLVNHVX -.-JO RIHOD H91}-F V)IV.l.VN}lV)I :10 .lHflO3 H91!-I VXVLVNHVX :10 RN03 HEJEH VHVLVNHVX :10 LEFIOD i~
u-nu-nu vs nu-uuu-nu-u\r-I uuarv uvunl IJT l\.HlIE'l£\1f'\I\I-'\ i'IH.'iI'"f LC
mm '£3'? comm me FOR PREIHIIERRY
'I'.{~§IS 3&3, "SEE C0333' MAE '1'!-D3 F€}I.LOIi'I1\fi:
O R D E R
In this petitian, the {pe£itiafia?’ n4aT*5’*
amxght Em: a wmlt of ¢§i:_;ectV§1.zg””:. t’he
resycsnczients ta conaiglar :*apr§S§ntat~::Lon
given by him as: per
Laazzned r;fv:;2:§.§:n.-3:15»; – .
$3.1 aubzreitgy’ “-2§e%;9,::g:1.;«:z:_§:;:’1’zV:f.é’1ta.t:ion has
baen c::>z;;Vz+is–:i.–+::J.::e1%’s?7_-V3 28 .10. 2008 .
In i=r.f,a1;=«z% submission, the
petiticsn Ldz::e”sn’z.:+t7′ sizrsiive fax: consideration.
..éthiéVV”j§é titix3n stands dimissed as
héasziznsg V ructuous .
Sd/-*
Iudge
V)lV1VNHV)l so 3.8003 HOEH V)lV.1.VNHV)| so 3.8803 I-{SIB VXVLVNBVX :10 J.!lf’!O3 H
H VHVLVNHVX :10 12H”|OD l-{DEM VXVLVNHVM :10 18003 H95!-I