High Court Kerala High Court

Srsh Kumari vs The District Educational Officer on 3 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Srsh Kumari vs The District Educational Officer on 3 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 38260 of 2007(D)


1. SRSH KUMARI, AGED 34 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,

4. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP. BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :03/01/2008

 O R D E R
                              S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

                          =======================

                            W.P.(C) No. 38260   of 2007(D)

                          =======================


                     Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2008




                                  JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a U.P. School Assistant working in an aided

school. She was originally appointed with effect from 25.8.2000

till the existence of the vacancy. But the 1st respondent

approved such appointment only upto 30.3.2001. In the above

circumstances, the manager re-appointed the petitioner with

effect from 6.6.2001. Against the order of the 1st respondent

approving the appointment only upto 30.3.01, the manager of

the school filed appeal which was rejected by the Deputy

Director as also the Director of Public Instruction. Against the

same the petitioner filed Ext.P7 revision petition before the 4th

respondent. Petitioner now confines her relief for a direction to

the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on

Ext.P7 expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In

the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a

W.P.(C) No. 38260/2007/D -2-

direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate

orders on Ext.P7, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within

two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment,

after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as

well as the manager of the school. If the petitioner so chooses, it

would be open to her to file additional pleadings with materials in

support of her claim and the 4th respondent shall consider the

same while disposing of Ext.P7.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

S.SIRI JAGAN,

JUDGE

jp