State Express Transport … vs C.Chandrasekharan Nair on 30 January, 2007

0
52
Kerala High Court
State Express Transport … vs C.Chandrasekharan Nair on 30 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA No. 146 of 2007()


1. STATE EXPRESS TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. C.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPOT IN-CHARGE, SETC,

3. RAMANATHAN, DRIVER,

4. AYYAPPAN OF NAGER COIL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.RAMACHANDRAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :30/01/2007

 O R D E R
                     M. Ramachandran & S. Siri Jagan,  JJ.

                     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

                           M.A.C.A. No.  146 of 2007

                     =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

                      Dated this, the 30th  January, 2007.


                                  J U D G M E N T

Siri Jagan, J.

Owner of an offending vehicle in a motor accident claim has

come up in appeal against the award of the M.A.C.T., Attingal in O.P

(MV) No. 782/99 in which for the injuries and consequent disabilities

suffered by the injured claimant, a total compensation of Rs. 27,140/-

has been awarded. The owner challenges the award both on the

ground of lack of negligence on the part of the driver as also excessive

amount of compensation awarded.

2. We have gone through the award. From the award, we find

that the Tribunal had given very cogent reasoning for coming to the

conclusion that the driver of the vehicle was in fact negligent.

Neither the appellant nor the driver of the vehicle has cared to

adduce any evidence to rebut the evidence adduced by the injured to

prove the negligence of the driver. That being so, we do not find any

merit in the challenge against the finding of the Tribunal that the

accident occurred on account of the negligence of the driver.

3. Regarding the amount of compensation, as against a total

amount of Rs. 65,000/- claimed by the injured, the Tribunal had

awarded an amount of Rs. 27,140/- under the following heads:

      "Pain and suffering                                        Rs. 10,000/-


      Transport of hospital                                      Rs. 01,500/-


      Hospitalisation & Transport                                Rs. 02,000/-


      Loss of income                                             Rs. 01,000/-


      Damage to clothing                                         Rs. 00.500/-


      Extra nourishment                                          Rs. 02,000/-


M.A.C.A. No. 146/2007                                        -:  2  :-



        As per medical bills & X-ray                                               Rs. 01,500/-


        Disability compensation

        (1800x12x8x5/100)                                                          Rs. 08,640/-


                                                                                   ------------------

                                                               Total               Rs. 27,140/-

                                                                                   ========"


On a consideration of the reasoning given by the Tribunal for

arriving at these amounts as compensation, we do not find any

reason to interfere with the same on the ground that the same is

excessive.

In view of our above finding, there is no merit in the appeal and

the same is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/- M. Ramachandran, Judge.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/

[True copy]

P.S to Judge.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here