. –……. .. …–…nn.nnn nawn ur AAKNAEAISA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA RIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
v
the accugaé wgith a =dal&y mi abfiut. 3 days. The.
“%33$fi fitéfiéfi far tfié 3312?’ is mncmnvinci§g{HJ ,
Excégt $53; tegtimfiny af ?.¥.i, théra i§w”§§: E;4*
matasiai ta ahmw’ that accasad had m-§§xa$i .
iztescausse with has an 3.3.3992 §t ii §;$f efha¢ _?
fiwfeaca hafi aisa eiiaitefi that thefa axe m§§e§3fy :.
fiiagutag hstwaaa ?.¥,§ amfi thé %£cu5é&, Eh vfiaw
af the said fiisaragancisgf t5é”?:ié1_ Cmuifi “fies
acqmittéé tha sccuseé. ?§a;§r§a£5a£ a¢qfiittal is
Efimfifi and §rc§e§ *aafi§ gQ$ea vf$g;’f’¢all far
3. Egvaai i$ @i$$i§fi§fi, _
Sd/«-
Judge
Sd/-.
Judge
33 i-19!!’-1* V}lV.l.VN2lV)l :10 3.3303 I-E93!-i V)lV.I.VN2iV)I :EO .!.UflO3 HEJIH V)W.lVNHV)| JO .I.3I”IOD HSIH VXVLVNRVX Hail-t VHVIVMXVH an :