IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.-____ DATED THIS was 218* DAY 0;' JULY 2003 ~j » PRESENT ma HONELE MR. DEEPAK VERMA, A This appealfifatzting' 01$' hearing this day, nnspm Acme camp Jt'£'8'l'ICE, delivered the followiagizf " wKareddy, learned Government Szri Rayappa Y. Hadagali, lfiamcd No.I and Srj Basavamj V Sabatrad, ' respondent No.2.
‘ . A statement has been made at the bar that
hem already been Withdrawn by the
V _ up’-zttitizzrxzer on 937.2008 and such withdrawal is pemaittcci by
noticing that even though the Icamw Singie Judge had
“E
A’
Iefcrrcd the matter as PIL, the main matter does not:”x’c1aVt»%; flii A’
acquisition .
3. Admittedly, this Writ appealldbafifiecn
State against the interiln older inv.W,1§.?€d.’2d9;5;é) 05
on 10.1.2007. sime the wn’t”p¢¢ja;5n.;;as been
withdrawn, the interim wouki not
suzvivfi. Hence, rendered
i11fiuctuo11S;”As’;:s:§{§1fiii$§}y’, it.i$’-!1ez¥3}§y’d§smissed as such.
since”‘th¢% appea _ 1’ Aitéeifis dismissed, f.A.II/O? filed by
-1133 for of delay does not survive for
“c>pn.sicI»-mfaticn, F __ u
Sd/-
Acting Chief Justice
Sd/-v
Judge