High Court Kerala High Court

State Of Kerala Represented By The vs Nousher on 8 September, 2010

Kerala High Court
State Of Kerala Represented By The vs Nousher on 8 September, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 3220 of 2008()


1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. NOUSHER, S/O.ISMAILKUNJU,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :08/09/2010

 O R D E R
             M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
            --------------------------
              Crl.M.C.No.3220 of 2008
            --------------------------

                       ORDER

The accused in Crime No.243/CR/KLM/06, being

investigated by CBCID, Kollam, was granted bail on

conditions by Annexure-A1 order dated 21.12.2006.

The second condition was that petitioner shall not

influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses

nor shall attempt to tamper with the evidence for

the prosecution. The fourth condition was that

petitioner shall not enter the limits of Thazhava

Village until further orders. This petition is

filed to cancel the bail granted under Section 439

of Code of Criminal Procedure contending that in

violation of the conditions, accused entered

Thazhava Village on 13.7.2008 at about 3.30 p.m.

and threatened the mother of the victim boy and

therefore, the bail is to be cancelled.

2. A complaint was filed before the Magistrate

by the mother of the victim regarding the incident

CRMC 3220/08 2

of 13.7.2008 only on 19.7.2008, based on which

Annexure-A2 FIR was registered. Respondent/accused

filed an affidavit denying the allegations and

stating that he did not enter Thazhava Village on

13.7.2008 and did not threaten the mother of the

victim as alleged. Except the allegations and

denial, there is no material in support of the

allegations that accused had violated the

conditions of the bail warranting cancellation of

the bail. Considering the fact that the alleged

incident was on 13.7.2008 and the complaint itself

was filed by the mother only on 19.7.2008 and there

was no further incident, I do not find that bail is

to be cancelled as sought for.

Petition is dismissed.

8th September, 2010 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)
tkv