IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RP.No. 668 of 2010()
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SPECIAL
... Petitioner
Vs
1. KALATHIL PARAMBIL PEETHAMBARAN,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER
For Respondent :SRI.M.M.SAIDU MUHAMMED
The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Dated :27/10/2010
O R D E R
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
R.P.668/2010 in LAA.1343/2005
& C.M.Appl.1289/2010
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 27th day of October, 2010.
Order
Heard the leaned counsel for parties, including
on the merits of the review petition. The plea
raised in the review petition is that the ground
in the appeal that the standing space of
improvements was not taken into consideration for
deducting any amount accountable under that head.
The total amount granted by way of enhancement of
value of improvements is Rs.12340.55. With this,
the amount that could have been deducted if at
all, was obviously meagre and it does not merit
consideration on a review petition filed with an
application seeking condonation of delay in 1383
days. There is really no legitimate reason
attributed to the delay in filing the review
petition. That apart, it is also not the case
that such a ground was addressed at the stage of
RP668/10 -: 2 :-
admission. Under such circumstances, I find that
there is no error apparent on the face of the
judgment calling for exercise of review, that
too, by condoning the enormous delay of 1363 days
in filing the review petition. Review petition
and the C.M.Application fail and they are
accordingly dismissed.
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,
Judge.
Sha/3010