IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
LA.App..No. 1589 of 2002()
1. STATE OF KERALA
... Petitioner
Vs
1. PRADEEP NARAYANAN, PLOT NO.74,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER
For Respondent :SRI.V.N.SWAMINATHAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI
Dated :08/06/2009
O R D E R
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.
------------------------
L.A.A.No.1589 OF 2002
------------------------
Dated this the 8th day of June, 2009
JUDGMENT
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.
It is brought to our notice by Sri.S.Dileep, learned counsel
for the claimant/respondent that the claimant had preferred
L.A.A. No.1127/2002 against the very same judgment, which is
impugned in this appeal. According to him, that L.A.A. was
allowed by this court by passing an order of remand to the
reference court on the reason that the requisitioning authority is
not a party to the proceedings before the reference curt.
We record the above submissions of the learned counsel for
the claimant and dispose of this appeal as unnecessary. It is
open to all the parties including requisitioning authority to
participate in the enquiry before the reference court pursuant to
that remand order and substantiate their rival contentions.
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE
dpk
WPC.No. 2
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE &
P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.
————————
L.A.A.No.1589 OF 2002
————————
JUDGMENT
8TH JUNE 2009