High Court Kerala High Court

State Of Krala vs Souda on 14 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
State Of Krala vs Souda on 14 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA.App..No. 176 of 2010()


1. STATE OF KRALA, REP.BY THE SPECIAL
                      ...  Petitioner
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD, ROADS

                        Vs



1. SOUDA, NANMANAKKANDY, OORALLUR,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :14/01/2011

 O R D E R
   PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
    -----------------------------------------------------------
                     LAA. No. 176 of 2010
          -----------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 14th day of January, 2011

                        J U D G M E N T

Pius C.Kuriakose, J.

Even though the respondent claimant had been served

with notice there is no appearance for her in this appeal

preferred by the Government. The property under

acquisition was in Naduvannur Village and the prupose of

the acquisition was construction of a bridge and approach

road at Kizhakkothu Kadavu. The land acquisition officer

awarded land value at the rate of Rs.3115.62 per cent.

Under the impugned judgment the reference court refixed

land value at Rs.28,500/- per cent. Our attention was

drawn by the learned senior Govt. Pleader to the judgment

of this Court in LAA. No. 489/07. It is submitted that under

that judgment for the identical property acquired for the

same purpose was involved. The property in that case was

also awarded the same rate as in the present case by the

LAA. No. 176/10
-2-

L.A. Officer. It is seen that under that judgment this court

has granted approval to the rate of Rs.10,000/- per cent

fixed by the reference court. We find merit in the

submission of the learned senior Govt. Pleader that there is

no justificationfor giving more enhancement to the present

respondent claimant over what was given to the claimant in

LAA. No. 489 of 2007. Under the above circumstance

allowing this appeal we modify the judgment and decree

and refix the value of land under acquisition at Rs.10,000/-

per cent.

(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

(K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE)

ksv/-