Gujarat High Court High Court

State vs Vaikunthbhai on 17 November, 2008

Gujarat High Court
State vs Vaikunthbhai on 17 November, 2008
Author: R.P.Dholakia,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Shah,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/11887/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 11887 of 2008
 

In
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2585 of 2008
 

To


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 11894 of 2008
 

In
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2592 of 2008
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

VAIKUNTHBHAI
GOVINDBHAI - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
GOVERNMENT
PLEADER for
applicants : 1 - 2. 
None for Respondent(s) : 1, 
DS AFF.NOT
FILED (R) for Respondent(s) : 1.2.1
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE MD SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 17/11/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA)

1. These
applications are for condonation of delay of 43 days respectively
that has aoccasioned in filing the First Appeals mentionend above.

2. Heard
the learned Counsel for both the sides. Learned Counsel Mr. Nitin
Amin for the opponents-original claimants on instructions makes a
statement that he has instructions also to file Vakalatnama in these
Civil Applications. He further assures the Court that he will file
Vakalatnama with a week from today.

3. We
have considered the averments made in the applications as also the
reasons explaining the delay that has been caused in filing the above
First Appeals. We are convinced that sufficient cause has been shown
for condoning the delay as prayed for. Hence, all these applications
deserve to be allowed.

4. Accordingly,
all these applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is made
absolute.

(R.P.Dholakia,J.)

(M.D.Shah,J.)

lee.

   

Top