IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Mat Appeal No. 630 of 2007()
1. SUBAIR, 37 YEARS, S/O.CHINGORA BEERAN
... Petitioner
Vs
1. PAREECHANTE PURAKKAL FATHIMA 33 YEARS,
... Respondent
2. SUFAIRA MOL, D/O.SUBAIR, 10 YEARS(MINOR)
3. SUNEER, S/O.SUBAIR, 6 YEARS (MINOR)
For Petitioner :SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID
Dated :16/11/2007
O R D E R
KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.
----------------------------------------------
Mat.Appeal No.630 of 2007
----------------------------------------------
Dated 16th November, 2007.
J U D G M E N T
Kurian Joseph, J.
All that the appellant is worried and aggrieved is
that the amounts already paid to the respondents towards
maintenance have not been taken into consideration by the
Family Court, while passing the order under appeal dated
9.4.2007, in O.P.No.735/06. On a perusal of the order also,
we find that there is no reference to the contention of the
appellant. If as a matter of fact, the appellant has paid any
amounts, for the period of 36 months now ordered to be
paid, the appellant is entitled to have the said amounts set
off against the claim for past maintenance. Since it is only
a matter for verification, it is for the appellant to move the
Family Court itself, in which case, the Family Court will
consider the grievance of the appellant on merits. The
judgment under appeal shall not stand in the way of the
Mat.Appeal No.630/07 2
Family Court conducting an enquiry on the request of the
appellant with regard to the above grievance.
The Mat.Appeal is disposed of as above.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE.
tgs
KURIAN JOSEPH &
HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ
———————————————-
Mat.Appeal No.630 of 2007
———————————————-
J U D G M E N T
Dated 16th November, 2007.