Subramani B vs M/S.Janzen Cast Metals Limited on 6 August, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT RAEECELORE

DATED THIS THE 06th DAY OF AUGU'S:fI',.2£§:10"  

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. IUSTIC-'E  OAS Of A

c.A.NO.296/201o iN.cO.E.12m99Zf

BETWEEN:
SR1 SUBRAMAN"fB..._ R    
S/OBHAGYAM     ' 
AGED ABOU'r'39 3:'E2~.k,Rs    _  ' T
MANAGING-._PAR.'£NER,'   R.  
M/S. VENK4&TFSHW;;¢1RA'CO£.D STORAGE,
TAMARA INDUSERLAJ.  KOLAR

 Q '      ..APPLICANT

(By sn:v.E.K'U:y:EAR,«. AD_vf,)"

  1i;E(sfIr~E\f§zEN METALS LIMITED

(IN 'I.;IQU1D;fi;TI©N)
REP, BYv__v"1'H.E..'0FFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE

~ R _   CORPORATE BHAVAN, N026/27,
~RAR=E1A TOWERS, 12m FLOOR,

 M 'MG.-ROAD, BANGALORE560 00:.

RESPONDENT

” ‘ * (By Sri K.S.MAHADEVAN 8: VJAYARAM, ADVS.)

flur/”

DI-(EV i

THIS APPLICATION FILED UNDER oRDER..iEtij;t.E_sE3i6,&..’9

AND RULE 177 OF THE COMPANY COURT RI.jLEs,”a-956
SECTION 15: OF CPC PRAYBNG TO coNDoNEV1fEEuE–._pELAY’mV ..

FILING CLAIMS. p

This application coming on for_oi’~ders this. day,*~”coi1irt

made the following;

This applicationi iS–..i’iledil’tov in filing the
claim petition: in the application
and I am; explanation for the delay.’

lfiehhiiteliyiivlallowecl. The delay in
filing the

sd/-I
JUDGE