Subramani vs State Of Karnataka on 22 September, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 22"" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. KUMARASWAM'I"--.'.jxV.'..'__E"17 

BETWEEN:

SUBRAMANI
S/O.vENI<ATESHAPPA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

R/AT. DOODAGUTTAHALLI

THAYALUR HOBLI

MULAGAL TALUK   _  
KOLAR. I   5 _._PET'IT_IO_N'*ER

(BY SRI: N CHANNAKRISHNAPPAV, ADVEOECATEI'  

AND:

STATE OF I<ARN_A.TAK'A._" " __,  

REPRESENTEDBY STA.T;E PUERIC _ ' _
PROSECUTOR,IHIGH- COU'RfF..BUILDING-.__ ~

BANGALORE.  ' '    _....RESPONDENT

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1079 Ioj 

TI-IISCRIMINAI_REv.IS1ON PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
397 AND 4:31 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET
A.SID.E_ THfE"IMP.UGNED OR'DE~R'OF DISMISSAL FOR DEFAULT DATED
1'o,es.2I3O9 PASSED IN CRL.A.38/2008 PASSED BY PRL. DISTRICT AND

SESSIONS" IU D--(3VE','I|<:O.L]1\R_.

 'TI«IIS.,CRII»II'N--AL'T;;.REvISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
'~....{3.EFORE T:-_£_E COLFRTTI (15 BAY, THE_ COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:--

ORDER

‘fE_LeeHr”r3ed Counsef for the petitioner has filed a Memo

‘ 22.9.2010. The Memo reads as Under:

/

I./”

“The undersigned advocate for petitioner
is not pressing the above petition. ‘He may be
permitted to withdraw the above petition.”

In view of Memo dated 22.9.2010, thisrf_ii’ci:i1;fii’nMé’i7″ A’

Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed«.. A_

KM