High Court Kerala High Court

Sudheesh.K.S. vs Joint Regional Transport Officer on 31 October, 2007

Kerala High Court
Sudheesh.K.S. vs Joint Regional Transport Officer on 31 October, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 30603 of 2007(R)


1. SUDHEESH.K.S., S/O.SUDHAKARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, PALA.
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FEROKE POLICE

3. MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT, SPECIAL SWUAD,

4. K.VIJAYAN,KRISHNA VIHAR, OLAVANNA P.O.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.HARIHARAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :31/10/2007

 O R D E R
                            ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                              --------------------------
                         W.P.(C). NO. 30603 OF 2007
                                ---------------------
                  Dated this the 31st day of October, 2007

                               J U D G M E N T

Petitioner, the registered owner of a Stage Carriage bearing Reg No.

KL- 35-2880, had transferred the vehicle to the 4th respondent. However

necessary endorsements were not made in the Registration Certificate.

Since the 4th respondent committed default in remitting the Motor Vehicle

Tax, the vehicle has been seized by the official respondents. Now the

petitioner submits that he is willing to clear the entire arrears and that the

respondents may be directed to release the vehicle seized by the official

respondents. It is submitted by the 4th respondent that he is still his

pressing his claim regarding the ownership of the vehicle in question.

2. Be that as it may, now that the registered owner of the vehicle is

the petitioner and that he is willing to clear the entire arrears due to the

official respondents, I see no justification for declining the reliefs sought for

by the petitioner.

3. Therefore, without prejudice to the contentions raised by the 4th

respondent against the petitioner, it is directed that on remittance of the

entire arrears and after satisfying them that he is still the registered owner

of the vehicle, the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
vps