Gujarat High Court High Court

Sudhirsinh vs State on 8 February, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Sudhirsinh vs State on 8 February, 2010
Author: H.B.Antani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/784/2010	 2/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 784 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

SUDHIRSINH
VISUBHA SISODIYA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
ND GOHIL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MS ML SHAH, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 08/02/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

This
is an application under Sec.439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973, by the applicant who came to be arrested in connection with CR
No. I-245/2009 registered at Sarkhej police station for the offence
punishable under Secs.379, 411, 447 and 114 of Indian Penal Code.

Learned
advocate Mr. N.D. Gohil for the applicant submitted that the
applicant is an innocent person and false case is foisted on him.
Considering the role played by the applicant as reflected in
Annexure:A to the application and the manner in which alleged offence
is committed by him, the applicant be also enlarged on bail.

Learned
APP Ms. M.L. Shah, representing the opponent State, while opposing
the bail application, submitted that the applicant is involved in the
offence punishable under Sections 379, 411, 447 and 114 of IPC.
Considering the role attributed to the applicant which is reflected
in the FIR at Annexure:A to the application, the manner in which the
offence is committed by him, no discretionary relief be granted to
the applicant and the application deserves to be rejected.

I
have considered the rival submissions. On perusal of the averments
made in the application, role attributed to the applicant which is
reflected in the FIR at Annexure:A to the application, provisions of
Sections 379, 411, 447 and 114 of IPC, quantum of punishment etc. I
am of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

In
the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed
and the applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail in connection
with CR No.I-245/2009 registered at Sarkhej Police Station on
executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees ten thousand only] with one
surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court and
subject to the conditions that he shall:

[a] not
take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;

[b] not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender
his passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week;

[d] not
leave the State of Gujarat without the prior permission of the
Sessions court concerned;

[e] mark
his presence at the concerned Police Station on any day of first week
of every English calendar month between 9.00 AM and 2.00 PM. till the
trial is over;

[f] furnish
the present address of his residence to the I.O. and also to the
Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change his
residence without prior permission of this Court;

[g] maintain
law and order.

If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions
Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or to take appropriate
action in the matter.

Bail
bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try
the case.

At the
trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of
preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this
Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct
Service is permitted.

(H.B.ANTANI,
J.)

pirzada/-

   

Top