Sugarwala vs Ansuyaben on 17 September, 2008

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/23468/2007	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 23468 of 2007
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
 
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================


 

SUGARWALA
FLOOR AND OIL - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

ANSUYABEN
KANJIBHAI - Respondent
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
PS
GOGIA for Petitioner : 1, 
RULE SERVED for
Respondent : 1, 
MR KISHOR M PAUL for Respondent :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 17/09/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

Heard
learned counsel for the parties.

Learned
counsel for respective parties have jointly requested for disposing
of the matter in terms of the settlement arrived at between the
parties. The consent terms dated 17.9.2008 signed by respective
counsel have been prepared and passed up. The same is taken on
record.

In
view of the consent terms produced by counsel for the parties, the
Award passed by the Labour Court impugned in this petition deserves
to be modified in terms of the consent terms. The petition is
disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. Interim relief stands
vacated forthwith. There shall be no order as to costs.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT,
J.)

pallav

Top