High Court Kerala High Court

Sugathan vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 15 February, 2007

Kerala High Court
Sugathan vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 15 February, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 932 of 2007()


1. SUGATHAN, S/O.GOPALAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SIJU KAMALASANAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :15/02/2007

 O R D E R
                                          V. RAMKUMAR, J.

                             ---------------------------------------------------

                                 Bail Application No.932 of 2007

                              ---------------------------------------------------

                                 DATED: FEBRUARY 15, 2007


                                               O R D E R

Petitioner who is the accused in C.R. No.225/2006 of Kottarakkara

Excise Range for an offence punishable under Sec,8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari

Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 3 litres of illicit arrack

on 17.12.2006 and who was also arrested on the same day, seeks his

enlargement on bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor admitted that no final report has

been filed even after 60 days of judicial custody of the petitioner. If so, by virtue

of the proviso to sec.167(2) Cr.P.C. the petitioner is entitled to be released on

bail as of right.

3. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his

executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two

solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M.-

I, Kottarakkara, and subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer

between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution

witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence

for the prosecution.

3. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation

Bail A.No.932/07 -:2:-

as and when required by the investigating officer.

4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail

granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as

above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

mt/-