High Court Kerala High Court

Sulaiman Sait vs Shamsudeen @ Shamsu on 26 September, 2008

Kerala High Court
Sulaiman Sait vs Shamsudeen @ Shamsu on 26 September, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 3637 of 2008()


1. SULAIMAN SAIT, S/O. MOOSA SAIT,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SHAMSUDEEN @ SHAMSU,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.JOSHI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :26/09/2008

 O R D E R
                              R.BASANT, J
                      ------------------------------------
                    Crl.M.C. No.3637 of 2008
                      -------------------------------------
           Dated this the 26th day of September, 2008

                                  ORDER

Petitioner, who faces indictment in a prosecution under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, who has already

been released on bail; the case against whom has now been

transferred to the list of Long Pending Cases consequent to his

failure to appear before the learned Magistrate and against

whom coercive processes have been initiated by the court, has

come to this Court with this petition praying for issue of

directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C to the learned Magistrate to

comply with the dictum in Alice George v. The Deputy

Superintendent of Police [2003(1) KLT 339] and to consider

his application for bail to be filed by him when he surrenders

before the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law

and expeditiously – on the date of surrender itself.

2. Sufficient general directions have already been issued

in Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

[2003(1) KLT 339]. I am not satisfied that it is necessary for

this Court in every subsequent case to issue directions under

Crl.M.C. No.3637 of 2008 2

Section 482 Cr.P.C to the Magistracy to follow the dictum in

Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police .

Every court must do the same. I have no reason to assume that

the same shall not be done. If there be non compliance, the

avenues of challenge/complaint are available for the petitioner.

3. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but

with the above specific observations.

4. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel

for the petitioner for production before the court below.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-