High Court Karnataka High Court

Sulochana Devi vs Syed Bakash on 31 May, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sulochana Devi vs Syed Bakash on 31 May, 2008
Author: Manjula Chellur Nagaraj
i1'~ITI-IE HIGH comm: 0:' KARHATAKAAT     _

THE no1~I*BLE BmS.JUS'I'ICE rmumg. '('§1I~IELI}vi.IiaR:4..  5; %

DATED THIS Tim 3181" IJAY ofiayav 20¢.-3 'jg,   «

F'RESE-NT

Aim
THE HOBFBLE nm.JUs*1?i1:E

mac. mas? 

asrwzjm-1;. 4' 5f  % '

1.

Smt. Suiqchmza Lég:-;v;, ”

Aged 35 _V ‘ .

W /0. Late-.S1*iI1ivs{$a’9.i11rt}:}r,’ ‘
Rf at NBA.”-41; Near }2.i11ba~J3i3avani
Tempia, Attyli’ 5¢a_§?=:_)ut, ” ,
Yc1a.h.aI:;ka, ” ” ”

Ba:.1g’–;3_i§fe — 560—£/}Q_4. _

(:32. !fiei.Lini1fatfu1a S ‘ S,

—.Agc<i éxbtrmi 1§2_yeax*s.

‘ 3. Vérxigatesil, L’ AT

‘ . _Age::1 aibcagtw 16 years.

4;:L”J§iSLfmavi,

” ‘:§ged–.ab0ut 8 yctagrs.

_:’Ap»p*§£la;1t Nc.~s.3 65 4 are II1il”l()2’S

Rep. By their mother and

“Natural guardian and next friend

and all are residing in the above:

month apart fmm bata of 1(}_f~ per day. .
ef the d€(3€aS€d is spoken to by £’\Evffg2 and ‘_w}i}§§;::P;–vé3» ‘4
the salary mfiiiicate. Having r e4gaI_fd ..

requimmexzts his efforts iii) ea>i::n.._V1no24e..c§aI1I1<fi§ '°£:tf'v«rL1l6~;i:1

cut. '1'he amount of bateg {rat :s:§¢:;:T%m its
€I1ti.I'fit}7. 8114: howevé:r; :§1av}.:}g.,' %'é§g§-j;%iV' -1.9 the extra
ameunt §xras:~"'gétfi¥Izg' the whoie
amount. sf an his family.

‘l’h€T€fGFt?:,__%rTi#§fiv,’&1#’:;*.: his ilzcome could
be tak@11 g1s ‘»f)i:;f ‘::10n%h. Even if he was paid

bata, the e:>{;3L-: r1s¢s§V”fQ;19§}tE1:£§;* personal needs would have

%;;ee;1,,.:jJ/gm from ‘:of §,5{){)/-. ‘1’h<: loss of

z:1_::i3¢13Ci €I1§:jse*.A__z11ontt1 weuid came to §{s.'2.,-333/–.¢

..Vki.is age i.e., 42 years at the time 9f h1'$

:iVeat.k1, L*1.rs""V2i;2,z'_'1i.1V:i;:)ie af :4 is applicaiizie.
V' ~ '[4«.._Ac§;:ordingly the fallowing amounts are awarded

' ___ "as Ci§)mpensati0i1 :-

_..;;iiI’fer<-:;:aig:¢ amouf:i.~«.,has tr) be paid together with interest

as-4s%is*arded by the '1'ribuna} from the date cf

Z fieposit the amount: as stated above.

V' Qftiiré amount deposited tha apportionment of the

a. Loss of dependency J:~<Es..3,91,999/- D
munded (If to l~{s.3,92,()()()/–. %

b. 'l'owa:'ds loss of c0£1s<3;'t:i1:1:ii"to«1:l'§e .y »«
wife-Ks.1€),i)()£)/–. I T}

:3. 'l'£}Wa;r«:is loss cf 1ave% a13d é\i'§T:§étioI1 A'
:0 the three :I1i139r' 'L"'VV(::_:i1il_dre:}é.r.Q
1<s.1o_.L:00/-. _ "

d. Towards loss of
Towards V fL§1€I’fi§– if _.

i11cider§tai’;:j3£:argcs ,V{VJ{;§£j;»

5. Aqcgrditigijgv_t11é.,_a;§§:>éa1.:§;§§VVa§iowed in part. The
e:r1haI1cefii__ cniiagiétisaffijon”0ii1<£:3.'r4;22,L)0U /- is awarded as

against thé"'-award' _:§fV.'.i{s.iI;;?,i£j5,£5£5{)/-. The e:nha11c:€:c£

of deposit. Eight; weeks time is

M4!

additiemi ammni: iogether with ixlterezst: .

di$bu:*s&i as per the directions of th¢f1'1*ii:1t11';;21i" _

made. S

PIG' %%%%