High Court Kerala High Court

Sulochana vs Sanjith Perathara on 11 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
Sulochana vs Sanjith Perathara on 11 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1663 of 2007()


1. SULOCHANA, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.BABU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SANJITH PERATHARA, 38/1318,OPP.AIR
                       ...       Respondent

2. T.P.SALEEM, AGED 37 YERS, S/O.ABDUL

3. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPNAY LIMITED,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN

                For Respondent  :SMT.A.SREEKALA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :11/08/2008

 O R D E R
                       M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
                = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                  M.A.C.A. NO. 1663 OF 2007
             = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 11th day of August, 2008.

                        J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode in O.P.(MV)1484/02.

The claimant, a 35 year old lady sustained injuries in a road

accident. She had a fracture on the forearm and also

haematoma over the forehead. She was initially treated in a

private hospital and thereafter continued treatment in the

Medical College Hospital. The Tribunal has also accepted the

case of fracture. The Tribunal did not consider Ext.C1

disability certificate issued by the Medical Board nor it had

considered properly the income of the person to award the

actual loss of earnings. No discussion is made at all

regarding the acceptability or non-acceptability of the

disability certificate. The Medical Board has certified that the

lady was having a mal-united fracture on the right ulna and

she was working as a sweeper in a private hospital. Taking

into consideration the mal-union of the fracture her capacity

M.A.C.A. 1663 OF 2007
-:2:-

to work as a sweeper as well as house wife would be difficult

at least to a minimal extend. I fix her income at Rs.1,500/-

being an accident of the year 2002, take the disability at 3%

and work out the compensation. When it is worked out for

one year it will be Rs.540/- which when multiplied by 16

would be Rs.8,640/-. Towards actual loss of earnings she is

entitled to Rs.3,000/- whereas Rs.1,000/- is granted. So an

additional amount of Rs.2,000/- is to be granted. For loss of

amenities and enjoyment in life I enhance the compensation

by Rs.1,000/-. Therefore the claimant will be entitled to an

additional compensation of Rs.11,640/-.

In the result the MACA is partly allowed and the

claimant is awarded an additional compensation of

Rs.11,640/- with 6% interest on the said sum from the date

of petition till realisation and the insurance company is directed

to deposit the same within a period of sixty days from the

date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-