High Court Kerala High Court

Suma vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 20 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
Suma vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 20 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25183 of 2008(W)


1. SUMA, W/O. LATE NAKULAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. RADHAKRISHNAN,

3. INDIRA, W/O. RADHAKRISHNAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.X.VARGHESE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI

 Dated :20/08/2008

 O R D E R
           K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI JJ.
        -----------------------------------------------------
                         W.P.(C)No.25183 OF 2008
            -----------------------------------------------------
            DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST, 2008

                            J U D G M E N T

Balakrishnan Nair, J.

The petitioner is residing in the property owned by her sister

Rema. The said property is having an extent of 23.75 cents comprised

in survey No.401/21 of Vadakkekara Village. Respondents 2 and 3 are

the neighbouring property owners. There is a pathway leading to their

house, which is on the northern side of the above said property. Now,

they are threatening to widen that pathway by trespassing into the

property. The petitioner has made all arrangements to move the civil

court. Since the power of attorney of her sister could not be obtained,

the suit could not be filed. So, she has filed Exhibit P2 petition before

the police pointing out the apprehended trespass from the part of

respondents 2 and 3 and others. But the police are not taking any

action. Since the petitioner is disabled from moving the civil court

because of the non-receipt of the power of attorney by her sister, she

is approaching this Court for appropriate reliefs. The Constitution does

not confer any power to this Court to act as an alternative forum for

the civil court and adjudicate the civil dispute between the petitioner

W.P.(C)No.25183/08 -2-

and respondents 2 and 3. Going by Exhibit P2, it would show that what is

apprehended is a civil trespass, for which the petitioner’s remedy is

before the civil court and not before the police station. In view of the

above position, the Writ Petition is dismissed, without prejudice to the

contentions of the petitioner and her right to move other forums for

appropriate reliefs. But, this judgment will not affect the powers of the

police to take action in accordance with law, if any cognizable offence is

reported.

K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE.

M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE.

dsn