High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sumitra Kumari Das vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 3 December, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Sumitra Kumari Das vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 3 December, 2010
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             MJC No.1695 of 2009
SUMITRA KUMARI DAS, WIFE OF RAM NATH MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -
KARMA BHAGWAN, P.S. AURANGABAD, DISTRICT - AURANGABAD.
                                                     ........ PETITIONER.
                                   Versus
  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.
  2. KUNDAN KUMAR, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRTE, AURANGABAD.
  3. RAM NIVASH PANDEY, THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER,
     DISTRICT - AURANGABAD.
                                        ........... CONTEMORS/OPPOSITE PARTIES.
                                  -----------

05/ 03.12.2010 This application was filed by the petitioner for

initiating a proceeding of contempt against the opposite

parties due to non-compliance of the order dated

6.2.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7334 of 2004. The

direction of this Court in the writ application was to

decide the service conditions of the petitioner and others

as well as their cadre and then only transfer order can be

passed. Since there was no service conditions rules frame

a direction was issued to frame service conditions rules

giving continuity of service to them so that they may not

loose their seniority, promotional avenue and pensionary

benefits and order of consequential benefits for which

they would be entitled being absorbed as government

servant.

Show cause has been filed on behalf of Deputy

Development Commissioner, Aurangabad (O.P. No. 3)
2

stating that in compliance of the direction of this Court

“The Bihar Lady Extension Officer Cadre Rules, 2008”

was framed in exercise of powers conferred under

Article 309 of the Constitution and the same was notified

through notification bearing No. 15735 dated 5.12.2008.

The service of the petitioner is state level cadre non-

Gazetted Class III posts. In different paragraphs of the

show cause the details in regard to each of the writ

petitioners has been given to show that only after

absorption of their service and considering the service

conditions rules, they were transferred, where they have

joined and paid their salary and all benefits for which

they are entitled according to service conditions rules are

made available to them.

Considering the statement in the show cause,

this application of contempt is disposed of.

DKS/                                (Mridula Mishra, J.)