IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Con.Case(C).No. 546 of 2010(S)
1. SUNEESH.T.S, S/O.SUKUMARAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. M.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
... Respondent
2. JAYACHANDRAN, THE SECRETARY,
For Petitioner :SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM
Dated :29/06/2010
O R D E R
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.
-------------------------------------
Cont.Case(C)No.546 of 2010
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010
J U D G M E N T
———————-
1. Allegation is that the respondents have failed
to comply with the direction in Annexure-I Judgment, to
the extent that they have failed in considering waiver of
interest/penal interest and expenses. Further it is
alleged that, inspite of payment of Rs.75,000/- before
15.1.2010, as stipulated in the judgment the
respondents have failed to intimate the petitioner about
the net balance payable, after adjusting all payments
and after considering waiver as directed.
2. Counsel for respondents produced a copy of
the letter sent by the Bank to the petitioner, on
17.4.2010, in compliance with the direction. Through
the said statement the Bank had permitted the
petitioner to make payment of the balance amount in 4
equal monthly installments starting from 15.5.2010
onwards.
COC.546/10 -2-
3. In view of the fact that a statement has already
been supplied and time for making payment of the balance
amount has been relaxed, I am of the view that the
respondents could not be held liable for any contempt,
eventhough there occurred some delay in issuing the
balance statement, due to which the petitioner has not been
put to any prejudice.
In the result the Contempt Case is hereby closed.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
okb