High Court Kerala High Court

Suni Mol vs Santhosh Kumar on 15 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Suni Mol vs Santhosh Kumar on 15 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Mat.Appeal.No. 422 of 2008()


1. SUNI MOL, AGED 23 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID

 Dated :15/07/2008

 O R D E R
           KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.
               -----------------------------------------
                  MAT. APPEAL No.422 OF 2008
               -----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 15th day of July, 2008.


                          J U D G M E N T

Kurian Joseph, J.

This appeal is filed against the judgment in

O.P.(HMA)No.116/2006 on the file of the Family Court, Kollam.

The said original petition was filed for dissolution of marriage on

the grounds available under Section 13(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu

Marriage Act.

2. It is seen that the respondent was set ex parte. In the

appeal also, though notice was served, there is no appearance.

The petition was dismissed mainly on the ground that as on the

date of filing the petition, two year period of separation had not

elapsed. Apparently, in view of the said view taken by the court,

no serious consideration on the other ground of cruelty was made

by the court.

3. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the appellant

submits that now that the period is over, the appellant may be

given an opportunity before the Family Court to amend the

M.A.No.422/08 2

pleadings so that much time and multiplicity of the proceedings

can be avoided.

Accordingly, we set aside the judgment and decree under

appeal in O.P.(HMA)No.116/2006 and remit the matter to the

Family Court, Kollam to be disposed of expeditiously, after giving

an opportunity to the appellant to amend the pleadings.

This appeal is disposed of as above.

KURIAN JOSEPH
JUDGE

HARUN-UL-RASHID
JUDGE

smp