High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Criminal Miscellaneous No.24873 of 2011
                           Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh,
                      S/o Late Dhanejar Singh @ Dhananjay Singh.
                                         Versus
                                   The State of Bihar
                                     -----------------

02. 16.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner,

informant and the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a

case registered under Sections 307, 379, 323, 504, 341,

147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that even though the

petitioner is alleged to have given a lathi blow on the head

of Shailendra Kumar Singh along with co-accused Binod

Kumar Singh but the injury sustained by him is simple in

nature as is evident from the injury report annexed in the

supplementary-affidavit. This fact is not disputed by the

counsel for the informant.

Considering the same, let the petitioner, above

named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of

arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within

a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order

on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each or any other

surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection

with Karagahar P.S. Case No. 88 of 2011 subject to the
2

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code

of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following

conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The

bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is

any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable

to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-