Sunil.P. vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 29 June, 2007

0
35
Kerala High Court
Sunil.P. vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 29 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3926 of 2007()


1. SUNIL.P., S/O.GOVINDHANKUTTY NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :29/06/2007

 O R D E R
                                     R.BASANT, J.

                                  ----------------------

                               B.A.No.3926  of 2007

                            ----------------------------------------

                     Dated this the  29th   day of June 2007


                                       O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The defacto complainant is a

police constable, who was on duty in connection with the Pooram

festival of a temple. Four named persons allegedly had attacked the

defacto complainant. Crime was registered against four specified

persons inter alia under Section 353 I.P.C. which is the only non-

bailable offence alleged. The petitioner is not one of those four

named accused persons. In the course of investigation, the police

have deleted accused 3 and 4 and have filed a report incorporating

two others including the petitioner as accused. The petitioner

apprehends imminent arrest. The learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent. False allegations

are being raised against the petitioner without any justification. In

these circumstances, at any rate, directions under Section 438 Cr.P.C

may be issued in favour of the petitioner, he prays.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the report to

array the petitioner as an accused has already been filed before the

learned Magistrate. Investigation is complete and the final report has

also been filed, it is further submitted. In the peculiar facts and

circumstances of this case and there is no serious objection from the

learned Public Prosecutor, the petitioner can be granted anticipatory

bail subject to appropriate terms and conditions.

B.A.No.3926/07 2

3. In the result, this petition is allowed. The petitioner shall

be released on bail on the following terms and conditions.

i) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate

having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 07/07/2007.

ii) He shall be released on regular bail on condition that he

execute bond for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only) with

two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

learned Magistrate.

iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m and 12

noon on 09/07/2007 and thereafter as and when directed by the

investigating officer in writing to do so.

(iv) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to arrest

the petitioner and deal with them in accordance with law, as if these

directions were not issued at all.

(v) If he was arrested prior to 07/07/2007, he shall be

released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

twenty five thousand only) without any sureties, undertaking to

appear before the learned Magistrate on 07/07/2007.






                                                               (R.BASANT, JUDGE)

jsr


                              // True Copy//          PA to Judge


B.A.No.3926/07    3


B.A.No.3926/07    4


       R.BASANT, J.





         CRL.M.CNo.





            ORDER





21ST DAY OF MAY2007


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here