High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sunil Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sunil Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2011
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Cr.Misc. No.25582 of 2011
                              Sunil Singh son of Sh. Bhav Sagar Singh
                                                  Versus
                                          The State Of Bihar
                                                -----------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumant Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. B.N. Pandey, Addl. P.P.

——-

3. 29.8.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 302/34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the occurrence took place at the

spur of the moment over cutting the wheat crops and there is

a counter version of the occurrence and the petitioner is in

custody since 29.5.2010 having no criminal antecedents, let

the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing

bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the

court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P.S.

Case No.44 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of

the bailor shall be Anil Kumar Singh, full brother of the

petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the Court about any change in address
-2-

of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that

the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is

he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also

state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v)

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )