IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr. Misc. No.21181 of 2010
SUNIL THAKUR son of Late Bhola Thakur
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2/ 18.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the
offence under sections 302, 379, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that there is no eye witness to the
occurrence and the entire case is based on suspicion. The recovery of
mobile of the deceased is also explained stating that it has transpired
during investigation that the deceased and petitioner had been in a
relationship of trust and it was not unnatural for him to be in
possession of the mobile phone of the deceased.
In view of the such, let the petitioner, above named, be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection
with Barhara Kothi P.S. case no.1 of 2010, subject to the conditions
(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner,
who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related
with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information
to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)
That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an
accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on
bail, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will
receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date
-2-
fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and
delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled
for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well
represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive
dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)