Posted On by &filed under Allahabad High Court, High Court.


Allahabad High Court
Sunil Tripathi vs State Of U.P.Thorugh Additional … on 29 January, 2010
Court No. - 11


Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 403 of 2010

Petitioner :- Sunil Tripathi
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thorugh Additional District / Session Judge Unn
Petitioner Counsel :- H.A.B.Sinha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Anil Kumar,J.

Notices on behalf of respondent no.1 and 2 have been accepted by learned
Standing Counsel.

Issue notice to respondent no.3 to show cause why the writ petition should not
be admitted.

Sri H.A.B. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner for the purpose of interim
relief submits that the definition of order as given under Section 2(14) C.P.C.
is “Order” means the formal expression of any decision of a Civil Court,
which is not a decree” and as such without having a required decree merely
on the basis of an order no execution proceeding may be allowed to initiate by
any person and he also relied in the case of Century Textiles Industries Ltd.
Vs. Deepak Jain and anothers (2009) 5 SCC 634 for the said purpose prima
facie submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be
correct as such, till the next date of listing, further implementation and
operation of the order dated 22.12.2008 and 22.9.2009 (Annexure 1 and 2)
passed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively shall remain stayed.

Order Date :- 29.1.2010
Pramod


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.135 seconds.