Sunil Yadav @ Pappu Yadav &Amp; Anr vs State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2010

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.21423 of 2010
                        SUNIL YADAV @ PAPPU YADAV & ANR
                                            Versus
                                     STATE OF BIHAR
                                          -----------

2. 12.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the

petitioners and counsel appearing for the

State.

The petitioners are apprehending their

arrest in a case registered under Sections

341, 323, 448, 504, 379, 384/34 of the I.P.C.

and Section 3(x) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention

of Atrocities) Act.

It is alleged that the informant was

assaulted and abused but subsequently the

informant retracted from his initial version

and filed a compromise petition.

It appears from the impugned order

that the learned Sessions Judge has refused

to exercise his jurisdiction on the ground

that the informant’s signature has not been

identified.

In that view of the matter, let the

petitioners surrender in the court below

alongwith an application on behalf of the

informant to the effect that informant had

filed duly verified compromise petition

and in that view of the matter, the regular
2

bail will be considered by the learned court

below and if the learned court below finds

that the informant has retracted from his

initial version then it is good ground for

grant of regular bail.

Let the learned court below pass an

appropriate order keeping in view the

aforesaid observation and if possible regular

bail may be disposed off on the same day.

The application is disposed off with

the aforesaid observations.

U.K.                                      (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)