Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
COMP/53/2011 2 ORDER
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
COMPANY
PETITION No. 53 of
2011
=================================================
SUPREME
TELECOMMUNICATION LTD - Petitioner(s)
Versus
PETRONET
V K LTD - Respondent(s)
=================================================
Appearance :
MRS
SANGEETA N PAHWA for Petitioner(s) : 1,
MR BHARAT T RAO for
Respondent(s) : 1,
=================================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
Date
: 07/09/2011
ORAL ORDER
Heard
Mr. Pahwa, learned advocate for the petitioner, and Mr. Rao, learned
advocate for the respondent.
Mr.
Rao, learned advocate for the respondent, has requested for time so
as to file reply affidavit opposing the petition.
The
request is opposed by Mr. Pahwa, learned advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pahwa has submitted that the statutory notice was issued in
February-2011, however, any reply has not been given by the company
in response to the statutory notice. He has also submitted that the
Court issued notice way back in March-2011, however, since the office
of the company was closed, it could not be served and therefore,
fresh notice was issued in May-2011. He submitted that, in this way,
almost 7 months have passed-by, but the company has failed to file
any reply and that therefore, the request may not be entertained.
Having
considered the request made by the learned advocate for the
respondent and considering the objection by the learned advocate for
the petitioner and having regard to the fact that the relief prayed
for by the petitioner seeks winding-up of the respondent-company, it
is considered appropriate to give an opportunity, as a last change,
to the respondent so as to enable it to file reply.
S.O.
to 19.9.2011.
[K.M.Thaker,
J.]
kdc
Top