High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Suraj Paswan vs State Of Bihar on 24 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Suraj Paswan vs State Of Bihar on 24 September, 2010
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Cr.Misc. No.32317 of 2010
              SURAJ PASWAN S/O PRABHU PASWAN
                             Versus
                       STATE OF BIHAR
                            -----------

2. 24.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offence under Sections 394 and 411 of the

Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that even though the

petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order dated

12.4.2010 vide Cr.Misc. No. 10396 of 2010 since he had

been identified in the Test Identification Parade but

subsequently another co-accused has been granted bail

by this court.

Considering the same as also the petitioner is

in custody since 31.7.2009 and now there is no other

case pending against the petitioner, let the petitioner

above named be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by

the court concerned to the satisfaction of Judicial

Magistrate, Ist Class Begusarai in connection with Ballia

P.S. Case No. 128/2009, subject to the conditions, (i)
2

That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as

to how he is related with the petitioner and the other

bailor shall be the father/brother of the petitioner. The

bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court

about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That

the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform

the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any

other case of similar nature after his release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail

on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the

given date and be present on date fixed for charge and

if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the

trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled

for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

The fact that there is no other case pending

against the petitioner shall be verified by the Magistrate

before releasing the petitioner on bail.

Fahad.                            ( Anjana Prakash, J. )